Federal Register - August 31, 2021
Versione di testo Cosa è?Dateas è un sito indipendente non affiliato a entità governative. La fonte dei documenti PDF che pubblichiamo qui è l'entità governativa indicata in ciascuno di essi. Le versioni in testo sono trascrizioni che realizziamo per facilitare l'accesso e la ricerca di informazioni, ma possono contenere errori o non essere complete.
Source: Federal Register
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 31, 2021 / Rules and Regulations exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act SBREFA of 1996 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions.
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of an agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a threshold for significant impact and a threshold for a substantial number of small entities. See 5 U.S.C. 605b.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule opens or expands hunting and sport fishing on 88 NWRs and 1
48839
NFH. As a result, visitor use for wildlife-dependent recreation on these stations will change. If the stations establishing new programs were a pure addition to the current supply of those activities, it would mean an estimated maximum increase of 40,839 user days one person per day participating in a recreational opportunity; see Table 2.
Because the participation trend is flat in these activities since 1991, this increase in supply will most likely be offset by other sites losing participants.
Therefore, this is likely to be a substitute site for the activity and not necessarily an increase in participation rates for the activity.
TABLE 2ESTIMATED MAXIMUM CHANGE IN RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES IN 20212022
Dollars in thousands Additional hunting days
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Station Audubon NWR
Bald Knob NWR
Bayou Sauvage NWR
Bayou Teche NWR
Big Branch Marsh NWR
Big Lake NWR
Bill Williams River NWR
Bogue Chitto NWR
Bond Swamp NWR
Brazoria NWR
Cache River NWR
Caddo Lake NWR
Camas NWR
Cape May NWR
Cat Island NWR
Charles M. Russell NWR
Cherry Valley NWR.
Choctaw NWR
Crab Orchard NWR
Cypress Creek NWR
Dale Bumpers White River NWR
Delta NWR
Desert NWR
Don Edwards NWR
Eastern Shore of Virginia NWR
Elizabeth Hartwell Mason Neck NWR
Ernest F. Hollings ACE Basin NWR
Everglades Headwaters NWR.
Featherstone NWR
Felsenthal NWR
Fisherman Island NWR
Florida Panther NWR
Franklin Island NWR
Grand Bay NWR
Great Dismal Swamp NWR
Great River NWR.
Great Swamp NWR
Green Lake NFH
Hackmatack NWR
Harbor Island NWR
Harris Neck NWR
Havasu NWR
Holla Bend NWR
J. Clark Salyer NWR
James River NWR
Julia Butler Hansen Refuge
Kern NWR
Kootenai NWR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:40 Aug 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Additional fishing days
Additional expenditures
10
30
344
472
120
2
66
45
220
86
60
87
250
100
45
10
160
365
$0.3
1.0
11.6
15.9
4.0
0.1
2.2
1.5
13.0
15.7
2.0
2.9
8.4
3.4
1.5
0.3
82
15
132
85
103
118
414
14
3,000
1,200
2.8
105.2
0.5
4.4
2.9
3.5
4.0
13.9
42.1
0.5
670
1,000
150
6
137
920
465
1,200
365
730
64.7
33.7
5.1
13.0
4.6
56.6
15.7
500
40
62
68
89
100
10
160
50
30
365
30
100
1,200
50
16.8
12.8
2.4
5.6
2.3
3.0
3.4
0.3
47.5
1.7
1.0
1.8
E:FRFM31AUR2.SGM
31AUR2