Federal Register - March 16, 2021
Versione di testo Cosa è?Dateas è un sito indipendente non affiliato a entità governative. La fonte dei documenti PDF che pubblichiamo qui è l'entità governativa indicata in ciascuno di essi. Le versioni in testo sono trascrizioni che realizziamo per facilitare l'accesso e la ricerca di informazioni, ma possono contenere errori o non essere complete.
Source: Federal Register
14378
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
requirement, the applicant must describe 1 Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for at least two full-time key project personnel designated to the AIVRTTAC through the entire project period and for consultants and subcontractors, as applicable;
2 Timelines and milestones for accomplishing the project tasks;
3 Using a personnel loading chart, detailed project activities through the entire project period, key personnel and any consultants or subcontractors that will be allocated to each activity, and the designated level of effort for each of those activities;
4 How the personnel allocations in the personnel loading chart are appropriate and adequate to achieve the projects intended outcomes, including an assurance that all personnel will communicate with stakeholders and RSA in a timely way;
5 How the proposed management plan will ensure that the training and TA products developed through this cooperative agreement are complete, accurate, and of high quality; and 6 How the proposed project will benefit from a diversity of perspectives, including AIVRS projects and consumers, State VR agencies, TA
providers, and policy makers, in its development and operation; and f Demonstrate in the narrative section of the application under Quality of the Evaluation Plan how the applicant proposes to collect and analyze data on specific and measurable goals, objectives, and intended outcomes of the project, including the effectiveness of the training and TA
provided. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe i Its proposed evaluation methodologies, including instruments, data collection methods, and analyses;
ii Its proposed standards or targets for determining effectiveness;
iii How it will use the evaluation results to examine the effectiveness of its implementation and its progress toward achieving the intended outcomes; and iv How the methods of evaluation will produce quantitative and qualitative data that demonstrate whether the project and individual training and TA activities achieved their intended outcomes.
Types of Priorities When inviting applications for a competition using one or more priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute, competitive preference, or invitational through a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Mar 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
notice in the Federal Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only applications that meet the priority 34 CFR
75.105c3.
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority, we give competitive preference to an application by 1 awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the application meets the priority 34 CFR 75.105c2i; or 2 selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of comparable merit that does not meet the priority 34 CFR
75.105c2ii.
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are particularly interested in applications that meet the priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a preference over other applications 34
CFR 75.105c1.
Final Definitions: We establish the following definitions for use in any competition in which the final priority is used:
Intensive training and technical assistance TA means training and TA
provided to the governing bodies of Indian Tribes that have received an AIVRS grant and to the current personnel of the AIVRS projects primarily on-site over an extended period. Intensive training and TA is based on an ongoing relationship between the training and TA center staff and the governing bodies of Indian Tribes that have received an AIVRS
grant and the current personnel of the AIVRS projects under the terms of a signed intensive training and TA
agreement.
Targeted training and technical assistance means training and TA based on needs common to one or more governing bodies of Indian Tribes that have received an AIVRS grant and to the current personnel of the AIVRS projects on a time-limited basis and with limited commitment of training and technical assistance center resources. Targeted training and TA are delivered through virtual or in-person methods tailored to the identified needs of the participating governing bodies of Indian Tribes that have received an AIVRS grant and to the current personnel of the AIVRS projects.
Universal training and technical assistance means training and TA
broadly available to governing bodies of Indian Tribes that have received an AIVRS grant and to the current personnel of the AIVRS projects and other interested parties through their own initiative, resulting in minimal interaction with training and technical assistance center staff. Universal
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
training and TA includes generalized presentations, products, and related activities available through a website or through brief contacts with the training and technical assistance center staff.
This document does not preclude us from proposing additional priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This document does not solicit applications. In any year in which we choose to use the priority and definitions we invite applications through a notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866, OMB
must determine whether this regulatory action is significant and, therefore, subject to the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by OMB. Section 3f of Executive Order 12866 defines a significant regulatory action as an action likely to result in a rule that may 1 Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities in a material way also referred to as an economically significant rule;
2 Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
3 Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or 4 Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the Presidents priorities, or the principles stated in the Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by OMB under section 3f of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this final regulatory action under Executive Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency 1 Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify;
2 Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and
E:FRFM16MRR1.SGM
16MRR1