Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations taking into accountamong other things and to the extent practicablethe costs of cumulative regulations;
3 In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select those approaches that maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity;
4 To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must adopt; and 5 Identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including economic incentivessuch as user fees or marketable permitsto encourage the desired behavior, or provide information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency to use the best available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these techniques may include identifying changing future compliance costs that might result from technological innovation or anticipated behavioral changes.
We are issuing this final priority and definitions only on a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs. In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches that maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that follows, the Department believes that this regulatory action is consistent with the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action does not unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions.
In accordance with these Executive orders, the Department has assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary for administering the Departments programs and activities. The costs would include the time and effort in responding to the priority for entities that choose to respond.
In addition, we have considered the potential benefits of this regulatory action and have noted these benefits in the background section of this document. The benefits include continuing to provide both TA and a structured training program focused on
VerDate Sep<11>2014

15:56 Mar 15, 2021

Jkt 253001

the VR process and practices and the unique skills and knowledge necessary to improve employment outcomes for American Indians with disabilities.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is not subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification: The Secretary certifies that this regulatory action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The U.S. Small Business Administration Size Standards define proprietary institutions as small businesses if they are independently owned and operated, are not dominant in their field of operation, and have total annual revenue below $7,000,000. Nonprofit institutions are defined as small entities if they are independently owned and operated and not dominant in their field of operation. Public institutions are defined as small organizations if they are operated by a government overseeing a population below 50,000.
The small entities that this regulatory action will affect are public or private nonprofit agencies and organizations, including Indian Tribes and institutions of higher education that may apply. We believe that the costs imposed on an applicant by the priority and definitions will be limited to paperwork burden related to preparing an application and that the benefits of the priority and definitions will outweigh any costs incurred by the applicant. There are very few entities that could provide the type of training and TA required under the final priority. For these reasons the priority and definitions will not impose a burden on a significant number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
The priority and definitions contain information collection requirements that are approved by OMB under OMB
control number 18200018; the priority and definitions do not affect the currently approved data collection.
Accessible Format: On request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format RTF or text format txt, a thumb drive, an MP3 file, Braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at
PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

14379

www.govinfo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format PDF. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department.
David Cantrell, Deputy Director, Office of Special Education Programs. Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
FR Doc. 202105430 Filed 31121; 4:15 pm BILLING CODE 400001P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 660
Docket No. 2103080049
RIN 0648BJ74

Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
20212022 Biennial Specifications and Management Measures; Correction National Marine Fisheries Service NMFS, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
AGENCY:

This action contains corrections to the final rule for the 20212022 Biennial Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for groundfish harvested in the U.S. exclusive economic zone off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California published on December 11, 2020. This action corrects: the Rockfish Conservation Area RCA waypoints for the 100 fathom depth contour, the other flatfish gear restrictions in the RCA, language describing the boundary lines for the depth contours, and the boundaries of the non-groundfish RCA
for California halibut, sea cucumber, and ridgeback prawns south of 3427 N.
lat. These corrections are necessary so the regulations accurately implement the Pacific Fishery Management
SUMMARY:

E:FRFM16MRR1.SGM

16MRR1