Journal of the Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Chicago - November 26, 1985
Version en texte Qu'est-ce que c'est?Dateas est un site Web indépendant, non affilié à un organisme gouvernemental. La source des documents PDF que nous publions est l'agence officielle indiquée dans chacun d'eux. Les versions en texte sont des transcriptions non officielles que nous faisons pour fournir de meilleurs outils d'accès et de recherche d'informations, mais peuvent contenir des erreurs ou peuvent ne pas être complètes.
Source: Journal of the Proceedings of the City Council of the City of Chicago
23004
JOURNAL-CITY COUNCIL-CHICAGO
11/26/85
SECTION 5.7. Severability. It is the intention of this City Council that, if any Article, Section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Fourth Supplemental Ordinance shall be ruled by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the invalidity of such Article, Section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions hereof SECTION 5.8. Effective Date. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish this Fourth Supplemental Ordinance in pamphlet form.
This Fourth Supplemental Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its enactment.
Preliminary Official Statement and Contract of Purchases are omitted for printing purposes but on file and available for inspection in the Office of the City Clerk.
MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS.
Time Fixed for Next Succeeding Regular Meeting.
By unanimous consent. Alderman Burke thereupon presented a proposed ordinance which reads as follows:
Be It Ordained by the City Council of the City ofChicago:
SECTION 1. That the next succeeding regular meeting ofthe City Council ofthe City of Chicago to be held after the meeting held on Tuesday the twentysixth 26th day of November, 1985, at 10:00 A.M. be and the same is hereby fixed to be held on Monday, the second 2nd day of December, 1985, at 10:00 A.M., in the Council Chamber in the City HalL
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its passage.
On motion of Alderman Burke, the foregoing proposed ordinance was Passed by yeas and nays as follows:
Yeas - Aldermen Roti, Rush, Tillman, Evans, Bloom, Sawyer, Beavers, Humes, Hutchinson, Vrdolyak, Huels, Majerczyk, Madrzyk, Burke, Brady, Langford, Streeter, Kellam, Sheahan, Kelley, Sherman, Stemberk, Krystyniak, Henry, Marzullo, Nardulli, W.
Davis, Smith, D. Davis, Hagopian, Santiago, Gabinski, Mell, Kotlarz, Banks, Damato, Cullerton, Laurino, OConnor, Pucinski, Natarus, Oberman, Hansen, McLaughlin, Orbach, Schulter, Volini, Orr, Stone 49.
Nays None.
Alderman Natarus moved to reconsider the foregoing vote. The motion was lost.
