Je veux savoir à propos de…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices Cellpage; Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT Limited Goldenpalm; ITC
LimitedEducation and Stationery Products Business ITC Limited; M/s.
Bhaskar Paper Products Bhaskar;
Dinakar Process Private Limited Dinakar; JC Stationery P Ltd. JC
Stationery; Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Kokuyo; Lodha Offset Limited Lodha; Lotus Global Private Limited Lotus Global; Magic International Pvt. Ltd. Magic; Marisa International Marisa; Navneet; Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd. Pioneer; PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited PP Bafna;
SAB International SAB; SGM Paper Products SGM; and Super Impex.4 On January 19, 2021, Pioneer, PP Bafna, SAB, SGM, and Super Impex timely withdrew their requests for review.5 On January 20, 2021, Cellpage, Lotus Global, and Kokuyo timely withdrew their requests for review.6 On January 28, 2021, ITC Limited, Bhaskar, Dinakar, and JC Stationery timely withdrew their requests for review.7 As detailed below, we are rescinding the review, in part, with respect to ten of the above companies. This review covers one mandatory respondent, Navneet. The other six companies were not selected for individual examination and remain subject to this administrative review.
Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is certain lined paper products.
4 Initiation
Notice, 85 FR at 68842.
Pioneers Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Pioneer, dated January 19, 2021 Pioneers Withdrawal of Request for Review; PP Bafnas Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of PP Bafna, dated January 19, 2021 PP Bafnas Withdrawal of Request for Review; SABs Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of SAB International, dated January 19, 2021 SABs Withdrawal of Request for Review; SGMs Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of SGM Paper Products, dated January 19, 2021 SGMs Withdrawal of Request for Review; and Super Impexs Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Super Impex, dated January 19, 2021 Super Impexs Withdrawal of Request for Review.
6 See Cellpages Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Cellpage Ventures Private Limited, dated January 20, 2021 Cellpages Withdrawal of Request for Review; Lotus Globals Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Lotus Global Private Limited, dated January 20, 2021 Lotus Globals Withdrawal of Request for Review; and Kokuyos Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Review of Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Private Limited, dated January 20, 2021
Kokuyos Withdrawal of Request for Review.
7 See ITC Limited, Bhaskar, Dinakar, and JC
Stationerys Letter, Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review, dated January 28, 2021
ITC Limited, Bhaskar, Dinakar, and JC Stationerys Withdrawal of Request for Review.
5 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:04 Sep 30, 2021

Jkt 256001

The merchandise subject to this order is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States HTSUS subheadings:
4811.90.9035, 4811.90.9080, 4820.30.0040, 4810.22.5044, 4811.90.9050, 4811.90.9090, 4820.10.2010, 4820.10.2020, 4820.10.2030, 4820.10.2040, 4820.10.2050, 4820.10.2060, and 4820.10.4000. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.
A full description of the scope of the Order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.8
Partial Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213d1, Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. As noted above, on January 19, 2021, Pioneer, PP Bafna, SAB, SGM, and Super Impex timely withdrew their requests for review.9 On January 20, 2021, Cellpage, Lotus Global, and Kokuyo timely withdrew their requests for review.10 On January 28, 2021, ITC
Limited, Bhaskar, Dinakar, and JC
Stationery timely withdrew their requests for review.11 Because there is still an active review request for Pioneer and SGM, we are not rescinding the review with respect to these companies.12 However, because there was a timely withdrawal of requests for review and because there are no other active requests for review, we are rescinding this review with respect to the following companies, pursuant to 19
CFR 351.213d1: Bhaskar, Cellpage, Dinakar, ITC Limited, JC Stationery, Kokuyo, Lotus Global, PP Bafna, SAB, and Super Impex.
8 See Memorandum, Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Lined Paper Products from India; 20182019, dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
9 See Pioneers Withdrawal of Request for Review;
PP Bafnas Withdrawal of Request for Review;
SABs Withdrawal of Request for Review; SGMs Withdrawal of Request for Review; and Super Impexs Withdrawal of Request for Review.
10 See Cellpages Withdrawal of Request for Review; Lotus Globals Withdrawal of Request for Review; and Kokuyos Withdrawal of Request for Review.
11 See ITC Limited, Bhaskar, Dinakar, and JC
Stationerys Withdrawal of Request for Review.
12 See Petitioners Letter, Request for Administrative Review, dated September 30, 2020.

PO 00000

Frm 00009

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

54427

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On November 23, 2020, Goldenpalm submitted a no-shipment certification.13
To confirm Goldenpalms no-shipment claim, on January 28, 2021, Commerce issued a no-shipment inquiry to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection CBP.14
CBP reported that it had no information to contradict Goldenpalms no shipments claim during the POR.15
Given that Goldenpalm reported that it made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and there is no information calling Goldenpalms claim into question, we preliminarily determine that Goldenpalm did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.
Consistent with Commerces practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to Goldenpalm but, rather, will complete the review and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.16
Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751a2 of the Act. Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 13 See Goldenpalms Letter, Response to Q & V
Questionnaire, dated November 23, 2020.
14 See Memorandum, No Shipment Inquiry, dated January 28, 2021.
15 See Memorandum, No shipment inquiry with respect to the company below during the period 09/
01/2019 through 08/30/2020 dated March 12, 2021.
16 Commerce determined to not rescind a review with respect to exporters that demonstrate that they had no knowledge of sales through resellers to the United States because we find it appropriate to instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the allothers rate applicable to the proceeding. Further, Commerce explained that it is more consistent with the Automatic Assessment Clarification not to rescind a review in part under these circumstances but rather to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review. See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 20122013, 79 FR
15951, 15952 March 24, 2014, unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 20122013, 79 FR
51306, 51307 August 28, 2014 at 67 citing Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
May 6, 2003 Automatic Assessment Clarification.

E:FRFM01OCN1.SGM

01OCN1