Je veux savoir à propos de…

53946

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 29, 2021 / Notices
Dated: September 23, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary.

complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/index.html.

FR Doc. 202121122 Filed 92821; 8:45 am
Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order is glycine at any purity level or grade. For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

BILLING CODE 3510DSP

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration A588878

Glycine From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 20182020
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Commerce determines that Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd. YGK and Nagase & Co., Ltd. Nagase collectively, YGK/
Nagase, and Showa Denko K.K. Showa Denko made sales of glycine from Japan at less than normal value during the period of review POR October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020.
DATES: Applicable September 29, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or James Hepburn, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202 4820195 and 202 4821882, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Background On July 8, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published these Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.2
The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS.
ACCESS is available to registered users at https access.trade.gov. In addition, a 1 See Glycine from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Administrative Review; 20182019, 86 FR 36105 July 8, 2022 Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum PDM.
2 See Memorandum, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Glycine from Japan; 20182020, dated concurrently with this notice Issues and Decision Memorandum.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:22 Sep 28, 2021

Jkt 253001

Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
For a list of the issues raised by parties, see the appendix to this notice.
Final Results of the Review The final weighted-average dumping margins are as follows:

Producer/exporter
Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd./
Nagase & Co., Ltd.3
Showa Denko K.K

Weightedaverage dumping margin percent 27.21
86.22

Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after the date of the public announcement of these final results of review, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224b.
Assessment Rate Commerce shall determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries.4
To determine whether the duty assessment rates covering the period were de minimis, in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR
351.106c2, for each respondent we calculated importer or customerspecific ad valorem rates by aggregating the amount of dumping calculated for all U.S. sales to that importer or customer and dividing this amount by 3 As explained in the Preliminary Results, based on the record information, Commerce determines that Nagase & Co., Ltd. and a non-selected respondent, Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd., are affiliated within the meaning of section 77133E
of the Act and we treated them as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401f. We have made no changes to this determination for these final results of review.
4 In these final results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
February 14, 2012.

PO 00000

Frm 00005

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

the total entered value of the sales to that importer or customer. Where an importer or customer-specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, and the respondent has reported reliable entered values, we applied the assessment rate to the entered value of the importers/customers entries during the POR, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212b1. Upon issuance of the final results of this administrative review, if any importer-specific assessment rates calculated in the final results are above de minimis i.e., at or above 0.5 percent, Commerce will issue instructions directly to CBP to assess antidumping duties on appropriate entries.
Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired i.e., within 90 days of publication.
Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these final results, as provided by section 751a2 of the Act:
1 The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final results of this administrative review; 2 for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 3 if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and 4 the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 53.66
percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.5 These cash deposit 5 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170 June 21, 2019.

E:FRFM29SEN1.SGM

29SEN1