Je veux savoir à propos de…

53024

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 183 / Friday, September 24, 2021 / Proposed Rules
persons engaged in the trade of antiquities beyond the consideration of a monetary threshold?
16. Which aspects of the current regulatory framework applicable to financial institutions should apply to persons engaged in the trade in antiquities?
a. Should FinCEN consider extending all or only some elements of AML/CFT
program requirements now applicable to financial institutions to the trade in antiquities, including: i A system of internal controls to ensure ongoing compliance, ii independent testing for compliance to be conducted by internal financial institution personnel or by an outside party, iii designation of an individual or individuals responsible for coordinating and monitoring day-today compliance, or iv training for appropriate personnel?
b. How could know-your-customer requirements, such as customer due diligence or customer identification programs, apply in the transaction process in the trade in antiquities? What would be the effect on industry of imposing customer verification and identification requirements on sellers, purchasers, and others involved in the trade in antiquities? How would the application of know-your-customer requirements to this industry assist in preventing money laundering, terrorist financing, and other illicit financial activity?
c. What, if any, difficulties are associated with requiring the disclosure of or otherwise obtaining beneficial ownership information for legal entities engaged in the trade of antiquities, including foreign legal entities that may be outside the scope of current or future U.S. beneficial ownership reporting requirements?
d. What should be the requirements for filing SARs related to antiquities?
What should FinCEN consider in implementing any requirements for filing SARs related to antiquities?
e. How many natural persons and legal entities might be affected by FinCENs application of BSA
requirements to persons engaged in the trade in antiquities, and what is the estimated hourly and annual burden, if any, for each such person, for each of the obligations described above? How could FinCEN minimize the burdens associated with these obligations, if any, through its decisions about the form or content of the rule while still ensuring the appropriate management and mitigation of AML/CFT risk?
B. Regulatory Planning and Review This ANPRM is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:14 Sep 23, 2021

Jkt 253001

12866 and has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
C. Conclusion With this ANPRM, FinCEN seeks input on the questions set forth above.
FinCEN welcomes comments on all aspects of the ANPRM, and all interested parties are encouraged to provide their views.
Dated: September 20, 2021.
Himamauli Das, Acting Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
FR Doc. 202120731 Filed 92321; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 481002P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR04OAR20210430; FRL906001
R4

Air Plan Approval; North Carolina;
Minor Revisions to Cotton Ginning Operations Rule Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan SIP submitted by the State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Air Quality, via a letter dated April 13, 2021, and received by EPA on April 14, 2021. This revision contains minor clarifying and typographical edits to North Carolinas cotton ginning operations rule. EPA is proposing to approve these changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act CAA or Act.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPAR04
OAR20210430 at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions audio, video, etc. must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system. For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 303038960.
The telephone number is 404 562
9144. Ms. Williams can also be reached via electronic mail at williams.pearlene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview On April 14, 2021, the State of North Carolina submitted changes to the North Carolina SIP for EPA approval. EPA is proposing to approve these changes to 15A North Carolina Administrative Code NCAC Subchapter 02D,1 Rule .0542Control of Particulate Emissions from Cotton Ginning Operations which establishes control requirements for particulate emissions from cotton ginning operations.
II. Analysis of North Carolinas SIP
Revision North Carolinas SIP revision contains minor clarifying and typographical edits to the text of Rule .0542.2 For example, the revision adjusts the citation format for cited rules; corrects several typographical errors; adds text clarifying the meaning of certain words and phrases; and corrects a citation error.
EPA has preliminarily determined that these changes do not interfere with attainment and maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards or any other applicable requirement of the Act because they are minor in nature. For these reasons, EPA is proposing to approve the changes to this rule.
III. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory 1 In the table of North Carolina regulations federally approved into the SIP at 40 CFR
52.1770c, 15A NCAC 02D is referred to as Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements.
2 See North Carolinas April 14, 2021 SIP revision at pp. 8286 of the pdf file available in the docket for this proposed rulemaking to review a redline version of the rule showing all of the proposed changes.

E:FRFM24SEP1.SGM

24SEP1