Je veux savoir à propos de…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Notices 7719C of the Act, as a manufacturer of a domestic like product in the United States.4 On June 8, 2021, US Magnesium timely filed its substantive response within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218d3i.5 Commerce received no substantive responses from any other interested parties with respect to the Order covered by this sunset review, nor was a hearing requested. On July 22, 2021, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.6 As a result, pursuant to section 751c3B of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218e1iiC2, Commerce is conducting an expedited 120-day sunset review of the Order.
Scope of the Order The product covered by the Order is magnesium metal from China, which includes primary and secondary alloy magnesium metal, regardless of chemistry, raw material source, form, shape, or size. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.7
Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail if the Order were revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS.
ACCESS is available to registered users at https access.trade.gov. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is included as an appendix to this notice. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/index.html.
4 Id.
5 See
Petitioners Letter, Five-Year Sunset Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Magnesium Metal from the Peoples Republic Of China:
Domestic Industry Substantive Response, dated June 8, 2021.
6 See Commerces Letter, Sunset Reviews Initiated on June 1, 2021, dated July 22, 2021.
7 See Memorandum, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Result of Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Magnesium Metal from the Peoples Republic of China, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:44 Sep 15, 2021

Jkt 253001

Final Results of Review Pursuant to sections 751c1 and 752c1 and 3 of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail would be weightedaverage margins of up to 141.49 percent.
Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305a. Timely notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notifications to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance with sections 751c, 752c, and 777i1 of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221c5ii.
Dated: September 10, 2021.
Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely To Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation FR Doc. 202120009 Filed 91521; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 3510DSP

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Trademark Petitions The United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO will submit the following information collection request to the OMB for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, on or
PO 00000

Frm 00007

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

51655

after the date of publication of this notice. The USPTO invites comment on this information collection renewal, which helps the USPTO assess the impact of its information collection requirements and minimize the publics reporting burden. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on May 3, 2021 during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments.
Agency: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce.
Title: Trademark Petitions.
OMB Control Number: 06510061.
Forms Numbers:
PTO 2303 Letter of Protest PTO 2304 Request to Make Special PTO 2305 Response to Petition to Director Inquiry Letter PTO 2306 Petition to Make Special PTO 2307 Request to Restore Filing Date PTO 2308 Request for Reinstatement Type of Review: Extension and revision of a currently approved information collection.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
6,221 respondents per year.
Estimated Number of Responses:
6,221 responses per year.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes the public between 40 minutes 0.67 hours to 75
minutes 1.25 hours, depending on the complexity of the situation, to gather the necessary information, prepare the appropriate documents, and submit the information to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 6,953 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $393,875.
Needs and Uses: The public uses this information collection for a variety of private business purposes related to establishing and enforcing trademark rights. The USPTO uses the information described in this information collection to process letters of protest, requests to make special, responses to petition inquiry letters, petitions to make special, requests to restore a filing date, and requests for reinstatement.
Information relating to the registration of a trademark is made publicly available by the USPTO. The release of information in a letter of protest is controlled and may be available upon request only.
Affected Public: Private sector;
individuals or households.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondents Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.

E:FRFM16SEN1.SGM

16SEN1