Federal Register - July 16, 2021
Version en texte Qu'est-ce que c'est?Dateas est un site Web indépendant, non affilié à un organisme gouvernemental. La source des documents PDF que nous publions est l'agence officielle indiquée dans chacun d'eux. Les versions en texte sont des transcriptions non officielles que nous faisons pour fournir de meilleurs outils d'accès et de recherche d'informations, mais peuvent contenir des erreurs ou peuvent ne pas être complètes.
Source: Federal Register
37712
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Proposed Rules TABLE II.1PERCENT OF SHIPPED LINEAR FEET FOR CRE BY EQUIPMENT CLASSContinued Equipment class
Percent
VCT.SC.I
VCS.SC.M
VCS.SC.L
VCS.SC.I
SVO.RC.M
PD.SC.M
0.3
25.4
15.0
0.1
8.2
7.6
Equipment class
Percent
HCT.SC.M
HCT.SC.L
HCT.SC.I
HCS.SC.M
HCS.SC.L
0.1
0.4
0.4
4.4
0.6
VOP = Vertical Open SVO = Semi-Vertical Open HZO = Horizontal Open VCT = Vertical Closed Transparent HCT = Horizontal Closed Transparent SOC = Service Over Counter PD = Pull-Down HCS = Horizontal Closed Solid VCS = Vertical Closed Solid RC = Remote Condensing SC = Self Contained M = Medium Temperature L = Low Temperature I = Ice Cream Temperature
TABLE II.2TOTAL ESTIMATED CRE SHIPMENTS FROM 2014 TO 2020
Year
2014
Estimated Shipments million units
Estimated Shipments million linear ft.
1.01
6.14
Issue 6: DOE requests annual sales data in units shipped or linear feet of shipped units of CRE from 2014 to 2020, disaggregated by equipment class.
DOE also seeks feedback on how the breakdowns by equipment class presented in Table II.1 of this document and the annual shipments estimates shown in Table II.2 of this document compare to the actual shipments in those years. If disaggregated shipments data are not available at the equipment class level, DOE requests shipments data at any broader available category.
Issue 7: DOE also seeks historical and current shipments data on any additional CRE categories under consideration for potential standards i.e., refrigerated salad bars, buffet tables, and preparation tables; soliddoor equipment for pull-down temperature applications; chef bases or griddle stands; high-temperature CRE;
and CRE with dedicated remote condensing units.
2. National Energy Savings The purpose of the national impact analysis NIA is to estimate aggregate impacts of potential new and/or amended efficiency standards at the jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
2015
1.03
6.24
2016
2017
1.06
6.45
2018
1.11
6.72
national level in terms of national energy savings NES and net present value NPV, discussed in section II.D.4 of this document of the total consumer benefits. The NIA considers lifetime impacts of potential standards on equipment shipped in a 30-year period that begins with the expected compliance date for new and/or amended standards.
DOE measures savings of potential standards relative to a no-newstandards case that reflects conditions without new and/or amended standards, and uses current efficiency market shares to characterize the no-newstandards case equipment efficiency distribution. By accounting for consumers who already purchase more efficient CRE, DOE avoids overstating the potential benefits from potential standards. In the March 2014 Final Rule, DOE developed efficiency trends for CRE in the no-new-standards case and the standards cases assuming that the market would move over time to adopt ENERGY STAR rated equipment.
To estimate the impact that energy efficiency standards would have in the year compliance becomes required, DOE
2019
1.16
7.00
1.21
7.30
2020
1.26
7.60
used a roll-up scenario. A roll-up scenario assumes that equipment efficiencies in the no-new-standards case, which do not meet the standard level under consideration, would roll up to meet the new efficiency standard level. Equipment shipments at efficiencies above the efficiency standard level under consideration are not affected. See chapter 10 of the March 2014 Final Rule TSD for details on this approach.
Issue 8: DOE seeks input on whether any market or technology changes would warrant a different approach to develop CRE efficiency trends than the one followed in the March 2014 Final Rule. DOE requests any relevant data that could be used to project efficiency trends for CRE.
C. Technological Feasibility 1. Technology Options During the March 2014 Final Rule, DOE considered a number of technology options that manufacturers could use to reduce energy consumption in CRE.
Table II.3 includes a complete list of those technology options considered in developing the March 2014 Final Rule.
TABLE II.3TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR CRE CONSIDERED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MARCH 2014 FINAL RULE
Technology option category
Technology option
Lighting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Jul 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Higher efficiency lighting e.g., Light Emitting Diodes LEDs.
Higher efficiency lighting ballasts.
Remote lighting ballast location.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:FRFM16JYP1.SGM
16JYP1