Federal Register - July 2, 2021
Version en texte Qu'est-ce que c'est?Dateas est un site Web indépendant, non affilié à un organisme gouvernemental. La source des documents PDF que nous publions est l'agence officielle indiquée dans chacun d'eux. Les versions en texte sont des transcriptions non officielles que nous faisons pour fournir de meilleurs outils d'accès et de recherche d'informations, mais peuvent contenir des erreurs ou peuvent ne pas être complètes.
Source: Federal Register
35253
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 125 / Friday, July 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules PSD associated with section 110a2DJ for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
4. Visibility Protection States are subject to visibility and regional haze program requirements under part C of the CAA which includes sections 169A and 169B. In the event of the establishment of a new NAAQS, however, the visibility and regional haze program requirements under part C do not change. Thus, we find that there is no new visibility obligation triggered under section 110a2J when a new NAAQS
becomes effective. In other words, the visibility protection requirements of section 110a2J are not germane to infrastructure SIPs for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
K. Section 110a2KAir Quality Modeling/Data SIPs must provide for performing air quality modeling for predicting effects on air quality of emissions of any NAAQS pollutant and submission of such data to EPA upon request.
EGLE continues to review the potential impact of major, and some minor, new and modified sources using computer models. Effective February 16, 2017, EPA updated the modeling appendix at 40 CFR part 51, appendix W 82 FR 5182. This action included
enhancements to the formulation and application of the EPAs preferred nearfield dispersion modeling system, AERMOD American Meteorological Society AMS/EPA Regulatory Model, and the incorporation of a tiered demonstration approach to address the secondary chemical formation of ozone and PM2.5 associated with precursor emissions from single sources. EPA
proposed approval of Michigans Part 9
Rule Update on March 24, 2021 86 FR
15837 incorporating the CFR update.
The finalization of the rule update will dictate finalization of this element.
Modeling data are available to EPA or other interested parties upon request.
EPA proposes that Michigan has met the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110a2K with respect to the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
L. Section 110a2LPermitting Fees EGLE implements and operates the title V permit program, which EPA
approved on December 4, 2001 66 FR
62969 EPA approved revisions to the program on February 28, 2006 71 FR
9934. EGLEs authority to levy and collect an annual air quality fee from fee-subject facilities is found in section 324.5522 of Act 451. EPA proposes that Michigan has met the infrastructure SIP
requirements of section 110a2L
with respect to the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
M. Section 110a2MConsultation/
Participation by Affected Local Entities States must consult with and allow participation from local political subdivisions affected by the SIP.
EGLE regularly works with local political subdivisions for attainment planning purposes and actively participates in regional planning organizations. Rulemaking is subject to notice, comment, and hearing requirements under the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, 1969 PA
306 and is authorized in MCL 324.5512.
EPA proposes that Michigan has met the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110a2M with respect to the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve most elements and disapprove one element of a submission from EGLE certifying that its current SIP is sufficient to meet the required infrastructure elements under sections 110a1 and 2 for the 2015
ozone NAAQS. The disapproved prong 4 does not begin a new FIP clock, as FIPs are already in place in response to those deficiencies.
EPAs proposed actions for the states satisfaction of infrastructure SIP
requirements, by element of section 110a2 are contained in the table below.
Element
2015 Ozone
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AEmission limits and other control measures
BAmbient air quality monitoring/data system
C1Program for enforcement of control measures
C2Minor NSR
C3PSD
D1I Prong 1: Interstate transportsignificant contribution to nonattainment
D2I Prong 2: Interstate transportinterference with maintenance
D3II Prong 3: Interstate transportinterference with PSD
D4II Prong 4: Interstate transportinterference with visibility protection
D5Interstate and international pollution abatement
E1Adequate resources
E2State board requirements
FStationary source monitoring system
GEmergency powers
HFuture SIP revisions
INonattainment planning requirements of part D
J1Consultation with government officials
J2Public notification
J3PSD
J4Visibility protection
KAir quality modeling/data
LPermitting fees
MConsultation/participation by affected local entities
In the above table, the key is as follows:
A
D
NA
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Approve.
Disapprove.
No Action/Separate Rulemaking.
Not germane to infrastructure SIPs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jul 01, 2021
Jkt 253001
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not
E:FRFM02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
NA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
