Je veux savoir à propos de…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

multi-unit aspects, procedural and training SAMDAs, and the reactor building crane design would need to be assessed when a specific site is proposed for constructing and operating a NuScale power plant.
The determination of this environmental assessment is that there will be no significant offsite impact to the public from this action. The environmental assessment is available as indicated under Section XV of this proposed rule.
XII. Paperwork Reduction Act This proposed rule contains new or amended collections of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. This proposed rule has been submitted to the OMB for review and approval of the information collections.
Type of submission: Revision.
The title of the information collection:
Appendix G to 10 CFR part 52 Design Certification Rule for NuScale.
The form number if applicable: NA.
How often the collection is required or requested: On occasion Who will be required or asked to respond: Applicant for a combined license, construction permit, or a design certification amendment.
An estimate of the number of annual responses: 5 2 annual responses and 3
recordkeepers.
The estimated number of annual respondents: 3.
An estimate of the total number of hours needed annually to comply with the information collection requirement or request: 389 hours 346 reporting hours + 43 recordkeeping hours.
Abstract: The NRC is proposing to amend its regulations to certify the NuScale standard design. This action is necessary so that applicants or licensees intending to construct and operate an NuScale standard design may do so by referencing this design certification rule.
The applicant for certification of the NuScale standard design is NuScale Power, LLC.
The NRC is seeking public comment on the potential impact of the information collection contained in this proposed rule and on the following issues:
1 Is the proposed information collection necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the NRC, including whether the information will have practical utility?
2 Is the estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection accurate?
3 Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected?

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:17 Jun 30, 2021

Jkt 253001

4 How can the burden of the proposed information collection on respondents be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology?
A copy of the OMB clearance package is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML20242A000 or can be obtained free of charge by contacting the NRCs Public Document Room reference staff at 18003974209, at 3014154737, or by email to PDR.resource@nrc.gov.
You may obtain information and comment submissions related to the OMB clearance package by searching on https www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC20170029.
You may submit comments on any aspect of these proposed information collections, including suggestions for reducing the burden and on the above issues, by the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC20170029.
Mail comments to: FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Mail Stop: T6A10M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 205550001 or to the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 31500151, Attn:
Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503; email: oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov.
Additionally, this proposed rule provides procedures for requesting access to proprietary and safeguards information for preparation of comments on the NuScale design certification proposed rule. These procedures are guidance for completing mandatory information collections located in 10 CFR parts 9 and 73 that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq..
These information collections were approved by OMB under approval numbers 31500043 and 31500002.
Send comments regarding this information collection to the FOIA, Library, and Information Collections Branch T6A10M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 0001, or by email to Infocollects.Resource@nrc.gov, and to the OMB reviewer at: OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 31500043 and 31500002, Attn: Desk Officer for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503; email: oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov.
Submit comments by August 30, 2021. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do
PO 00000

Frm 00015

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

35013

so, but the NRC is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.
Public Protection Notification The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number.
XIII. Agreement State Compatibility Under the Policy Statement on Adequacy and Compatibility of Agreement States Programs, approved by the Commission on June 20, 1997, and published in the Federal Register 62 FR 46517; September 3, 1997, this proposed rule is classified as compatibility NRC. Compatibility is not required for Category NRC
regulations. The NRC program elements in this category are those that relate directly to areas of regulation reserved to the NRC by the Atomic Energy Act or the provisions of 10 CFR, and although an Agreement State may not adopt program elements reserved to the NRC, it may wish to inform its licensees of certain requirements by a mechanism that is consistent with a particular States administrative procedure laws, but does not confer regulatory authority on the State.
XIV. Voluntary Consensus Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995, Public Law 104113, requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. In this proposed rule, the NRC intends to certify the NuScale standard design for use in nuclear power plant licensing under 10 CFR
parts 50 or 52. Design certifications are not generic rulemakings establishing a generally applicable standard with which all 10 CFR parts 50 and 52
nuclear power plant licensees must comply. Design certifications are Commission approvals of specific nuclear power plant designs by rulemaking. Furthermore, design certifications are initiated by an applicant for rulemaking, rather than by the NRC. This action does not constitute the establishment of a standard that contains generally applicable requirements.
XV. Availability of Documents The documents identified in the following table are available to
E:FRFM01JYP1.SGM

01JYP1