Federal Register - June 30, 2021
Version en texte Qu'est-ce que c'est?Dateas est un site Web indépendant, non affilié à un organisme gouvernemental. La source des documents PDF que nous publions est l'agence officielle indiquée dans chacun d'eux. Les versions en texte sont des transcriptions non officielles que nous faisons pour fournir de meilleurs outils d'accès et de recherche d'informations, mais peuvent contenir des erreurs ou peuvent ne pas être complètes.
Source: Federal Register
34674
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 30, 2021 / Proposed Rules
administering the Departments programs and activities.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Potential Costs and Benefits The proposed priorities and definitions would impose minimal costs on entities that would receive assistance through the Departments discretionary grant programs. Additionally, the benefits of implementing the proposed priorities and definitions outweigh any associated costs because it would result in the Departments discretionary grant programs encouraging the submission of a greater number of high-quality applications and supporting activities that reflect the Administrations educational priorities.
Application submission and participation in a discretionary grant program are voluntary. The Secretary believes that the costs imposed on applicants by the proposed priorities and definitions would be limited to paperwork burden related to preparing an application for a discretionary grant program that is using a priority in its competition. Because the costs of carrying out activities would be paid for with program funds, the costs of implementation would not be a burden for any eligible applicants, including small entities.
Clarity of the Regulations Executive Order 12866 and the Presidential memorandum Plain Language in Government Writing require each agency to write regulations that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on how to make the proposed priorities and definitions easier to understand, including answers to questions such as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly stated?
Do the proposed regulations contain technical terms or other wording that interferes with their clarity?
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if we divided them into more but shorter sections?
Could the description of the proposed regulations in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this preamble be more helpful in making the proposed regulations easier to understand? If so, how?
To send any comments that concern how the Department could make the proposed priorities and definitions easier to understand, see the instructions in the ADDRESSES section.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive order is to foster an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Jun 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and actions for this program.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification The Secretary certifies that this proposed regulatory action would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The U.S. Small Business Administration Size Standards define proprietary institutions as small businesses if they are independently owned and operated, are not dominant in their field of operation, and have total annual revenue below $7,000,000. Nonprofit institutions are defined as small entities if they are independently owned and operated and not dominant in their field of operation. Public institutions are defined as small organizations if they are operated by a government overseeing a population below 50,000.
The small entities that this proposed regulatory action would affect are early learning providers, school districts, IHEs, nonprofit organizations, and forprofit organizations. Of the impacts we estimate accruing to grantees or eligible entities, all are voluntary and related mostly to an increase in the number of applications prepared and submitted annually for competitive grant competitions. Therefore, we do not believe that the proposed priorities and definitions would significantly impact small entities beyond the potential for increasing the likelihood of their applying for, and receiving, competitive grants from the Department.
Paperwork Reduction Act The proposed priority and definitions do not contain any information collection requirements.
Accessible Format: On request to the program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format.
The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format RTF or text format txt, a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
view this document, as well as all other documents of the Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format PDF. To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department.
Miguel Cardona, Secretary of Education.
FR Doc. 202114003 Filed 62921; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 400001P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board 37 CFR Part 381
Docket No. 21CRB0002PBR 2023
2027
Determination of Rates and Terms for Public Broadcasting PB IV
Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Royalty Judges publish for comment proposed regulations that set rates and terms for the use of certain copyrighted works by certain public broadcasting entities for the period beginning January 1, 2023, and ending December 31, 2027.
DATES: Comments and objections, if any, are due no later than July 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by docket number 21CRB
0002PBR 20232027, online through eCRB at https app.crb.gov.
Instructions: To send your comment through eCRB, if you do not have a user account, you will first need to register for an account and wait for your registration to be approved. Approval of user accounts is only available during business hours. Once you have an approved account, you can only sign in and file your comment after setting up multi-factor authentication, which can be done at any time of day. All comments must include the Copyright Royalty Board name and the docket number for this proposed rule. All properly filed comments will appear without change in eCRB at https
app.crb.gov, including any personal information provided.
SUMMARY:
E:FRFM30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1