Je veux savoir à propos de…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

date of the date when the Severe area RACT SIP will be due, i.e., 36 months from the effective date of the EPAs final rule reclassifying Eastern Kern to Severe assuming we finalize the proposed 18month schedule for submittal. We will accept comments from the public on this proposed rule for the next 30 days.
The deadline and instructions for submission of comments are provided in the DATES and ADDRESSES sections at the beginning of this preamble.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011, this proposed action is not a significant regulatory action and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. Because the statutory requirements are clearly defined with respect to the differently classified areas, and because those requirements are automatically triggered by reclassification, the timing of the submittal of the Severe area requirements does not impose a materially adverse impact under Executive Order 12866. For these reasons, this proposed action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use 66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001.
In addition, I certify that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq. and that this proposed rule does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Pub. L. 1044, because the EPA is seeking comment solely on the timing of submittal requirements.
Executive Order 13175 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000 requires the EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications. Policies that have tribal implications is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. There are no Indian reservation lands or other areas where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:42 Jun 04, 2021

Jkt 253001

jurisdiction within the Eastern Kern ozone nonattainment area, and thus, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175.
This proposed action also does not have federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, nor on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999. This proposed action does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997, because the EPA
interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5501 of the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation.
As this proposal would set a deadline for the submittal of CAA required plans and information, the requirements of section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note do not apply. This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq..
Executive Order 12898 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994 establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. The EPA believes that this action, which addresses the timing for the submittal of Severe area ozone planning requirements, does not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental health effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898.

PO 00000

Frm 00022

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

30237

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 27, 2021.
Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
FR Doc. 202111706 Filed 6421; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 261
EPAR10RCRA20210142; FRL10023
45Region 10

Hazardous Waste Management System; Proposed Exclusion for Identifying and Listing Hazardous Waste Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and request for comment.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA also, the Agency or we in this preamble is proposing technical amendments to an existing exclusion from the list of federal hazardous waste delisting issued to the United States Department of Energy Energy under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. These modifications address changes to the 200-Area Effluent Treatment System associated with the delisting necessary to accept liquid effluents expected to be generated from vitrification of certain low-activity mixed wastes at the Hanford Federal Facility, or Hanford Site, in Richland, Washington.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 7, 2021. Requests for an informal hearing must reach the EPA by June 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPAR10
RCRA20210142 via www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Due to restrictions related to COVID19, submission of comments via mail or hand delivery is not feasible at this time.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPAR10RCRA2021
0142. The EPAs policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless SUMMARY:

E:FRFM07JNP1.SGM

07JNP1