Je veux savoir à propos de…

10470

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Further, for any non-DOE licensees, the NRC will continue using a matrix to determine the effort levels associated with conducting generic regulatory actions for the different licensees in the uranium recovery fee class; this is similar to the NRCs approach for fuel facilities, described previously. The matrix methodology for uranium
recovery licensees first identifies the licensee categories included within this fee class excluding DOE. These categories are: Conventional uranium mills and heap leach facilities, uranium in situ recovery ISR and resin ISR
facilities, and mill tailings disposal facilities. The matrix identifies the types of operating activities that support and
benefit these licensees, along with each activitys relative weight See the work papers. Currently, there is only one remaining non-DOE licensee, which is a non-resin in situ recovery facility. Table XIII displays the benefit factors for the non-DOE licensee in that fee category:

TABLE XIIIBENEFIT FACTORS FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSES
Number of licensees
Fee category
Benefit factor per licensee
Total value
Benefit factor percent total
Conventional and Heap Leach mills 2.A.2a
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities 2.A.2b
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities 2.A.2c
Section 11e.2 disposal incidental to existing tailings sites 2.A.4

0
1 0
0

0
190
0 0

0
190
0 0

0
100.0
0 0

Total

1

190

190

100.0

The annual fee for the remaining nonDOE licensee is calculated by allocating
100 percent of the budgeted resources, as summarized in Table XIV.

TABLE XIVANNUAL FEES FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSEES
Other than DOE
Actual dollars FY 2020
final annual fee
Facility type fee category Conventional and Heap Leach mills 2.A.2a
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities 2.A.2b
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities 2.A.2c
Section 11e.2 disposal incidental to existing tailings sites 2.A.4

e. Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities The NRC proposes to collect $0.315
million in annual fees from the nonpower production or utilization
facilities fee class in FY 2021, as shown in Table XV. The non-power production or utilization facility fee class replaces the research and test reactor fee class from previous fiscal years. This revised fee class accounts for commercial non-

FY 2021
proposed annual fee
N/A
$49,200
N/A
N/A

N/A
$45,900
N/A
N/A

reactor production and utilization facilities expected to be used for the production of medical isotopes. The final FY 2020 research and test reactors fees are shown for comparison purposes.

TABLE XVANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR NON-POWER PRODUCTION OR UTILIZATION FACILITIES
Actual dollars FY 2020
final
FY 2021
proposed
Total budgeted resources
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts

$3,317,830
3,030,000

$3,992,782
3,655,000

Net 10 CFR part 171 resources
Allocated generic transportation
Fee-relief adjustment
Billing adjustments

287,830
30,713
6,183
12,980

337,782
32,585
N/A
55,539

Total required annual fee recovery

325,341

314,827

Total non-power production or utilization facilities licenses

4

4

Total annual fee per license rounded

81,300

78,700

tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS

Summary fee calculations
In comparison to FY 2020, the proposed annual fee for the non-power production or utilization facilities fee
VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:29 Feb 19, 2021

Jkt 253001

class is decreasing, primarily due to a rise in 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings to support the following: 1

PO 00000

Frm 00012

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

Activities associated with the review of the GE Nuclear Test Reactor license renewal application; 2 activities
E:FRFM22FEP1.SGM

22FEP1