Je veux savoir à propos de…

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

8654

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 24 / Monday, February 8, 2021 / Notices
International Trade Commission, telephone 202 2051802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 2020.
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 2, 2021, ordered that 1 Pursuant to subsection b of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection a1B of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph 2 by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 13, 68, 11, 13, 1618, 20, and 21 of the 430; claims 1, 2, and 1214 of the 849; claims 820 of the 823 patent; and claims 14, 710, and 1619 of the 178
patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection a2 of section 337;
2 Pursuant to section 210.10b1 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10b1, the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is electronic devices with wireless connectivity, specifically mobile phones, tablet computers, and smart televisions;
3 For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served:
a The complainants are:
Ericsson Inc., 6300 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX 75024
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, SE164 83
Stockholm, Sweden Ericsson AB, Torshammnsgartan 23, Kista, 16480 Stockholm, Sweden b The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129
Samsung-Ro, Maetan-3dong, Yoeongtong-Gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi, 16677, Republic of Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85
Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ, 076602112
Samsung Electronics Vietnam Thai Nguyen Co., Ltd., Yen Binh I

VerDate Sep<11>2014

21:24 Feb 05, 2021

Jkt 253001

Industrial Zone, Dong Tien, Pho Yen District, Thai Nguyen Province, Thai Nguyen 250000, Vietnam Samsung Electronics Vietnam Co., Ltd., 1 Industrial Park, Commune, Yen Trung, Yen Phong District, Bac Ninh Province 16000, Vietnam Samsung Electronics HCMC CE
Complex, Co., Ltd., Lot I11, D2 Road, Saigon Hi-Tech Park, Tang Nhon Phu B Ward, District 9, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam 4 For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party to this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commissions Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16e and 210.13a, as amended in 85 FR 15798 March 19, 2020, such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 2, 2021.
Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission.
FR Doc. 202102476 Filed 2521; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 702002P

PO 00000

Frm 00077

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act On January, 29, 2021, the United States lodged a proposed consent decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Chains and Links, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:18cv 50268 N.D. Ill.. The proposed consent decree, if approved by Court after public comment, will fully resolve claims of the United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA against two of the four defendants named in the complaint, which seeks to recover response costs incurred by EPA in cleaning up a portion of the Bautsch Gray Mine Superfund site Site near Galena, Illinois. To resolve claims against them under Sections 106, 107, and 113g2 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606, 9607a, and 9613g2, the settling defendants Thomas Wienen and Chains and Links, Inc. C&Lwill reimburse the United States for $1,292,000 in response costs, which they shall pay in three installments over an 18-month period.
In addition, the settling defendants must 1 use best efforts to secure the cooperation of a non-settling defendant in executing an environmental covenant with respect to a portion of the Site that C&L and the non-settling defendant jointly own and 2 pay to EPA 75% of the net proceeds if the property is sold after construction of the remedy at the Site. The proposed consent decree will provide the settling defendants with a Covenant Not to Sue, under which the United States will covenant not to sue or take administrative action against the settling defendants pursuant to Sections 106 and 107a of CERCLA
regarding the Site, except as specifically provided in the Reservation of Rights clause. The proposed Consent Decree does not affect the United States claims in the amended complaint with respect to the two non-settling defendants West Galena Development, Inc. and the Estate of Lois Jean Wienen.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer United States v. Chains and Links, Inc. et al., D.J. Ref. No. 9011310235.
All comments must be submitted no
E:FRFM08FEN1.SGM

08FEN1