Federal Register - January 28, 2021
Version en texte Qu'est-ce que c'est?Dateas est un site Web indépendant, non affilié à un organisme gouvernemental. La source des documents PDF que nous publions est l'agence officielle indiquée dans chacun d'eux. Les versions en texte sont des transcriptions non officielles que nous faisons pour fournir de meilleurs outils d'accès et de recherche d'informations, mais peuvent contenir des erreurs ou peuvent ne pas être complètes.
Source: Federal Register
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 17 / Thursday, January 28, 2021 / Notices revoked, is provided in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 A list of the sections in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at http
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed on the internet at http enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review Pursuant to sections 751c1, 752c1 and 3 of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the Order would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail are weighted-average dumping margins up to 145.18 percent.
Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or the conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751c, 752c, and 777i1 of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218 and 19
CFR 351.221c5ii.
Dated: January 22, 2021.
Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
5 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jan 27, 2021
Jkt 253001
FR Doc. 202101909 Filed 12721; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 3510DSP
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration A570836
Glycine From the Peoples Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019
2020
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Commerce continues to find that certain companies covered by this administrative review made no shipments of subject merchandise during the period of review POR
March 1, 2019, through February 29, 2020. Commerce also continues to find that Avid Organics Private Limited Avid is part of the China-wide entity.
DATES: Applicable January 28, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202 4825760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
On October 22, 2020, Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the Peoples Republic of China China covering the POR.1 We received comments from interested parties with respect the Preliminary Results. The deadline for these final results of review is February 19, 2021. We conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act.
The product covered by this antidumping duty order is glycine, which is a free-flowing crystalline material, like salt or sugar. Glycine is produced at varying levels of purity and is used as a sweetener/taste enhancer, a 1 See Glycine from the Peoples Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 20192020, 85 FR
67332 October 22, 2020 Preliminary Results.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
buffering agent, reabsorbable amino acid, chemical intermediate, and a metal complexing agent. This proceeding includes glycine of all purity levels.
Glycine is currently classified under subheading 2922.49.4020 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States HTSUS.2 Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received The sole issue raised with respect to the Preliminary Results by parties to this administrative review is addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3
The issue raised by parties and the other areas covered in the Issues and Decision Memroandum are identified in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at https
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes From the Preliminary Results We made no revisions to the Preliminary Results.
Final Determination of No Shipments
Background
Scope of the Order
AppendixSections in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. History of the Order V. Legal Framework VI. Discussion of the Issues 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping Likely to Prevail VII. Final Results of Sunset Review VIII. Recommendation
7357
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We preliminarily determined that Studio Disrupt, Mulji Mehta Enterprises, Kumar Industries, and Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd., did not have shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.4 After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or additional information with respect to these four companies.
Therefore, for the final results, we 2 In separate scope rulings, Commerce determined that: a DPhenylglycine Ethyl Dane Salt is outside the scope of the order and b Chineseglycine exported from India remains the same class or kind of merchandise as the China-origin glycine imported into India. See Notice of Scope Rulings and Anticircumvention Inquiries, 62 FR 62288
November 21, 1997 and Glycine from the Peoples Republic of China: Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 73426 December 10, 2012, respectively.
3 See Memorandum, Glycine from the Peoples Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Administrative Review; 20192020, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice Issues and Decision Memorandum.
4 See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 6732223.
E:FRFM28JAN1.SGM
28JAN1