Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices Scope of the Order The products covered by this Order are PET film from India. For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213d1, Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the parties that requested a review withdraw the request within 90
days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation. Commerce received timely-filed withdrawal requests from to MTZ Polyesters Ltd. MTZ, Polyplex Corporation Ltd. Polyplex, and Uflex Ltd. Uflex, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213d1. Because the withdrawal requests were timely filed, and no other party requested a review of these companies, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213d1, Commerce is rescinding this review of the Order with respect to MTZ, Polyplex, Uflex.
Intent To Rescind Administrative Review, in Part It is Commerces practice to rescind an administrative review of a CVD
order, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213d3, when there are no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended.6
Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the CVD
assessment rate calculated for the review period.7 Therefore, for an administrative review of a company to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection CBP to liquidate at the calculated CVD assessment rate calculated for the review period.8
According to the CBP import data, except for the mandatory respondent and its cross-owned companies, the companies subject to this review did not have reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which liquidation is suspended. Accordingly, in the absence of reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR, we intend to rescind this khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

5 Id.
6 See,
e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the Peoples Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 March 20, 2017; see also Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the Peoples Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017, 84 FR 14650
April 11, 2019.
7 See 19 CFR 351.212b2.
8 See 19 CFR 351.213d3.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:21 Jul 30, 2021

Jkt 253001

administrative review with respect to one company, Vacmet India Ltd., in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213d3.
Methodology Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751a1A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act. For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, we preliminarily find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an authority that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.9 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included at the appendix to this notice.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS.
ACCESS is available to registered users at http access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/.
Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review There are three companies for which a review was requested and not rescinded, and which were not selected as mandatory respondents. The statute and Commerces regulations do not directly address the establishment of rates to be applied to companies not selected for individual examination where Commerce limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777Ae2 of the Act. However, Commerce normally determines the rates for non-selected companies in reviews in a manner that is consistent with section 705c5 of the Act, which provides the basis for calculating the allothers rate in an investigation.
Section 705c5Ai of the Act instructs Commerce, as a general rule, to calculate an all-others rate equal to the weighted average of the countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and/or producers individually examined, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. In this review, none of the rates for respondents were zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts 9 See sections 7715B and D of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 7715E
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 7715A of the Act regarding specificity.

PO 00000

Frm 00019

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

41451

available. For the companies for which a review was requested that were not selected as mandatory company respondents, and for which Commerce did not receive a timely request for withdrawal of review, Commerce based the subsidy rate on the rate calculated for the sole mandatory respondent.
Preliminary Results of Review In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221b4i, we preliminarily determine the following net countervailable subsidy rates for the POR:
Manufacturer/exporter SRF Limited 10

Subsidy rate percent ad valorem 2.82

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable to the Following Companies 11
Ester Industries Limited
Garware Polyester Ltd
Jindal Polyester Ltd

2.82
2.82
2.82

Disclosure and Public Comment We will disclose to parties in this review the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within five days of publication of these preliminary results.12 Interested parties may submit written comments case briefs on the preliminary results no later than 30 days from the date of publication of this Federal Register notice, and rebuttal comments rebuttal briefs within seven days after the time limit for filing case briefs.13 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309d2, rebuttal briefs must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument: 1 A statement of the issue; 2 a brief summary of the argument; and 3 a table of authorities.14 All briefs must be filed electronically using ACCESS.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310c, interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Hearing requests should contain: 1 The partys name, address, 10 SRF Limited is also known as SRF Limited of India.
11 This rate is based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 735c5A of the Act.
12 See 19 CFR 351.224b.
13 See 19 CFR 351.309c1ii; 351.309d1; and 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing requirements.
14 See 19 CFR 351.309c2 and d2.

E:FRFM02AUN1.SGM

02AUN1