Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act.
The products covered by the order are heavy walled rectangular welded steel pipes and tubes from Mexico.5 Products subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States HTSUS
item number 7306.61.1000. Subject merchandise may also be classified under 7306.61.3000. Although the HTSUS numbers and ASTM
specification are provided for convenience and for customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.
Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are listed in Appendix I
to this notice and addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS.
ACCESS is available to registered users at http access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain changes to the weighted-average dumping margin calculations for Maquilacero and Prolamsa, and the companies not selected for individual review, for the final results.6
Final Results of the Review
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES

We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to the firms listed below for the period September 1, 2018, through August 31, 2019:
4 See Memorandum, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Mexico;
20182019, dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice Issues and Decision Memorandum.
5 For a full description of the scope of the order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum.
6 See Issues and Decision Memorandum.

17:21 Jul 30, 2021

Jkt 253001

without regard to antidumping duties.
For the companies which were not Producers/exporters selected for individual review, because we are assigning these companies an assessment rate based on the cash Maquilacero S.A. de C.V
0.00 deposit rate calculated for Maquilacero and Prolamsa,8 we will instruct CBP to Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V
0.00 liquidate these entries without regard to Companies Not Selected for Inantidumping duties. The final results of dividual Review 7
0.00 this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on Review-Specific Rate for Companies entries of merchandise covered by the Not Selected for Individual Review final results of this review.9
Commerces automatic assessment The dumping margins for the practice will apply to entries of subject exporters or producers not selected for merchandise during the POR produced individual review are listed in by Maquilacero or Prolamsa for which Appendix II.
the reviewed companies did not know Disclosure that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary e.g., a reseller, trading Commerce intends to disclose the company, or exporter was destined for calculations performed in connection the United States. In such instances, we with these final results to interested will instruct CBP to liquidate parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate with 19 CFR 351.224b.
companyies involved in the Assessment Rates transaction.10
Pursuant to section 751a2C of the We intend to issue liquidation Act, and 19 CFR 351.212b1, instructions to CBP no earlier than 41
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
days after the date of publication of the Customs and Border Protection CBP
final results of this review in the shall assess, antidumping duties on all Federal Register, in accordance with 19
appropriate entries of subject CFR 356.8a.
merchandise in accordance with the Cash Deposit Requirements final results of this review.
The following cash deposit Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212b1, requirements will be effective for all where Maquilacero and Prolamsa shipments of the subject merchandise reported the entered value of their U.S.
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, sales, we calculated importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rates based for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of on the ratio of the total amount of this administrative review, as provided dumping calculated for the examined by section 751a2C of the Act: 1
sales to the total entered value of the The cash deposit rate for each specific sales for which entered value was reported. Where Prolamsa did not report company listed above will be equal to entered value, we calculated the entered the weighted-average dumping margin that is established in the final results of value in order to determine the this review, except if the rate is less assessment rate. Where either the respondents weighted-average dumping than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de margin is zero or de minimis within the minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106c1, in which case the cash meaning of 19 CFR 351.106c1, or an deposit rate will be zero; 2 for importer-specific rate is zero or de previously reviewed or investigated minimis, we will instruct CBP to companies not covered in this review, liquidate the appropriate entries the cash deposit will continue to be the 7 Under section 735c5A of the Act, the allcompany-specific cash deposit rate others rate is normally an amount equal to the published for the most recently weighted average of the estimated weighted-average completed segment in which the dumping margins established for exporters and company was reviewed; 3 if the producers individually examined, excluding any exporter is not a firm covered in this margins that are zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely on the basis of review, a prior review, or the original facts available. For these final results, we have less-than-fair-value LTFV
Weightedaverage dumping margin percent
Scope of the Order
VerDate Sep<11>2014

41449

calculated weighted-average dumping margins for Maquilacero and Prolamsa that are zero, and we have not calculated any margins which are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, we have assigned to the companies not individually examined a margin of zero percent. The exporters/producers subject to this review, but not selected for individual review, are listed in Appendix II.

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

8 This rate was calculated as discussed in footnote 7, above.
9 See section 751a2C of the Act.
10 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
May 6, 2003.

E:FRFM02AUN1.SGM

02AUN1