Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 248 / Thursday, December 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 12. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 RFA, as amended, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis IRFA was incorporated into the Call Blocking Fourth Report and Order. The Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. This Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis FRFA conforms to the RFA.
13. Need for, and Objectives of, the Order. The Order on Reconsideration reconsiders and clarifies certain aspects of the transparency and redress requirements adopted in the Call Blocking Fourth Report and Order to ensure that voice service providers continue to block unwanted and illegal calls, while also protecting the interests of legitimate callers and consumers. The rules adopted in the Order on Reconsideration help clarify certain aspects of our rules while promoting greater flexibility for voice service providers in meeting the obligations set forth in the Call Blocking Fourth Report and Order.
14. Summary of Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response to the IRFA. The Commission responded to all significant issues raised in response to the IRFA in the Call Blocking Fourth Report and Order.
15. Response to Comments by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Pursuant to the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, which amended the RFA, the Commission is required to respond to any comments filed by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration SBA, and to provide a detailed statement of any change made to the proposed rules as a result of those comments. The Chief Counsel did not file any comments in response to the proposed rules in this proceeding.
16. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements. This Order on Reconsideration does not adopt any new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small entities.
17. Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant alternatives that it has considered in reaching its approach, which may include the following four alternatives among others: 1 The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:53 Dec 29, 2021

Jkt 256001

account the resources available to small entities; 2 the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; 3 the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and 4 an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities. The Order on Reconsideration relieves a burden on small voice service providers by allowing such providers more flexibility in meeting the immediate notification requirements adopted in the Call Blocking Fourth Report and Order.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Telecommunications, Telephone.

64.1200

74375

Delivery restrictions.

k
10 Any terminating provider that blocks calls pursuant to an opt-out or opt-in analytics program, either itself or through a third-party blocking service, must provide, at the request of the subscriber to a number, at no additional charge and within 3 business days of such a request, a list of calls to that number, including the date and time of the call and the calling number, that the terminating provider or its designee blocked pursuant to such analytics program within the 28 days prior to the request.

FR Doc. 202128212 Filed 122921; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 671201P

Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Final Rules
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 part 64 as follows:
PART 64MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
1. The authority citation for part 64
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154, 201, 202, 217, 218, 220, 222, 225, 226, 227, 227b, 228, 251a, 251e, 254k, 262, 276, 403b2B, c, 616, 620, 14011473, unless otherwise noted; Pub. L. 115141, Div. P, sec.
503, 132 Stat. 348, 1091.

2. Effective January 31, 2022, amend 64.1200 by revising paragraphs k9
introductory text and k9i to read as follows:

64.1200

Delivery restrictions.

k
9 Any terminating provider that blocks calls based on any analytics program, either itself or through a thirdparty blocking service, must immediately return, and all voice service providers in the call path must transmit, an appropriate response code to the origination point of the call. For purposes of this rule, an appropriate response code is:
i In the case of a call terminating on an IP network, the use of Session Initiation Protocol SIP code 603, 607, or 608;

3. Delayed indefinitely, further amend 64.1200 by revising paragraph k10
to read as follows:

PO 00000

Frm 00023

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
Docket DARS20210026
RIN 0750AL50

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Trade Agreements Thresholds DFARS Case 2022D003
Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement DFARS to incorporate revised thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization Government Procurement Agreement and the Free Trade Agreements, as determined by the United States Trade Representative.
DATES: Effective January 1, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kimberly Bass, 5713726174.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:

I. Background This rule adjusts thresholds for application of the World Trade Organization WTO Government Procurement Agreement GPA and Free Trade Agreements FTA as determined by the United States Trade Representative USTR. The trade agreements thresholds are adjusted every two years according to predetermined formulae set forth in the agreements. The USTR has specified the
E:FRFM30DER1.SGM

30DER1