Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

53630

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 28, 2021 / Notices
Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain revisions to the margin calculations for Both-Well.5
However, these revisions did not change the weighted-average dumping margin for Both-Well 6 and, consequently, did not change the rate assigned to the nonindividually examined, separate rate respondents. See Dumping Margin for Non-Individually Examined Companies Granted a Separate Rate below.
Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Dalian Guangming Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.;
Jiangsu Forged Pipe Fittings Co., Ltd.;
Lianfa Stainless Steel Pipes & Valves Qingyun Co., Ltd.; and Qingdao Bestflow Industrial Co., Ltd. had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.7 We received no arguments identifying information that contradicts this determination.
Therefore, we continue to find that these companies had no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR and will issue appropriate liquidation instructions that are consistent with our automatic assessment clarification for these final results.8
Separate Rate Respondents In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Both-Well and six other companies demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate.9 We received no comments or arguments since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provide a basis for reconsideration of these separate rate determinations.
Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that the six companies listed in the table under ReviewSpecific Rate Applicable to the Following Non-Selected Companies in the Final Results of the Review section of this notice are eligible for a separate rate.
5 See Memorandum, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Forged Steel Fittings from the Peoples Republic of China: Final Results Calculation Memorandum for Both-Well, dated concurrently with this notice.
6 Id.
7 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 16187.
8 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 October 24, 2011 Assessment Practice Refinement.
9 See Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 16187.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:35 Sep 27, 2021

Jkt 253001

Dumping Margin for Non-Individually Examined Companies Granted a Separate Rate In the Preliminary Results,10 because the only participating mandatory respondent i.e., Both-Well eligible for a separate rate received a weightedaverage dumping margin of zero percent, we looked for guidance to section 735c5B of the Act, which instructs Commerce to use any reasonable method to determine the rate for exporters that are not being individually examined and found to be entitled to a separate rate. Accordingly, in the Preliminary Results, we assigned the calculated weighted-average dumping margin of the sole participating mandatory respondent, Both-Well i.e., zero percent, as the weighted-average dumping margin for the non-individually examined, separate rate respondents. No parties commented on the methodology for calculating this separate rate. For the final results, as the revisions we made to the margin calculations for Both-Well did not change the weighted-average dumping margin for Both-Well i.e., zero percent, we continue to find it appropriate to assign the calculated weighted-average dumping margin of the sole participating mandatory respondent, Both-Well i.e., zero percent, as the weighted-average dumping margin for the non-individually examined, separate rate respondents.
The China-Wide Entity In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined that Ningbo Zhongan, a company selected for individual examination, had not established its eligibility for a separate rate.11 Moreover, Commerce preliminarily determined that 14 other companies for which a review was initiated did not establish their eligibility for a separate rate because they failed to provide a separate rate application, a separate rate certification, or a no-shipment certification if they were already eligible for a separate rate.12 As such, we preliminarily determined that Ningbo Zhongan and these additional 14 companies are part of the China-wide entity.13 We received no comments or arguments since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provide a basis for reconsideration of these determinations. Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that the fifteen companies identified at 10 See
Preliminary Results PDM at 8.
at 45.
12 See Appendix II of this notice which identifies these 14 companies along with Ningbo Zhongan.
13 See Preliminary Results PDM at 45.
11 Id.

PO 00000

Frm 00003

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Appendix II to this notice are a part of the China-wide entity.
Commerces policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide entity applies to this administrative review.14 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the China-wide entity.15 Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity in this review, the China-wide entity is not under review and the China-wide entitys rate i.e., 142.72
percent is not subject to change as a result of this review.16
Final Results of the Review For the companies subject to this review, which established their eligibility for a separate rate, Commerce determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the POR:

Exporter
Both-Well Taizhou Steel Fittings Co., Ltd

Weightedaverage dumping margin percent 0.00

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to the Following Companies Ningbo Long Teng Metal Manufacturing Co., Ltd
Ningbo Save Technology Co., Ltd
Q.C. Witness International Co., Ltd
Yingkou Guangming Pipeline Industry Co., Ltd
Yuyao Wanlei Pipe Fitting Manufacturing Co., Ltd
Xin Yi International Trade Co., Limited

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751a2C of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212b, Commerce has determined, and U.S Customs and Border Protection CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International 14 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 November 4, 2013.
15 Id.
16 See Order, 83 FR at 60397.

E:FRFM28SEN1.SGM

28SEN1