Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 178 / Friday, September 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679
RTID 0648XA980

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Standardized Bycatch Reporting Methodology Amendments to the Fishery Management Plans for the Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs, Scallops, and Salmon National Marine Fisheries Service NMFS, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of agency decision.
AGENCY:

NMFS announces the approval of Amendment 51 to the Fishery Management Plan FMP for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands BSAI King and Tanner Crabs Crab FMP, Amendment 17 to the FMP for the Scallop Fishery Off Alaska Scallop FMP, and Amendment 15 to the FMP
for the Salmon Fisheries in the EEZ Off Alaska Salmon FMP collectively Amendments. These Amendments add to or modify language in the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs to more transparently reflect and align the FMPs with the way bycatch is currently reported in the fisheries managed by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council Council. These Amendments are intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Magnuson-Stevens Act; the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs; and other applicable laws.
DATES: The Amendments were approved on September 13, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Amendments, the Categorical Exclusion, and the Analysis prepared for this action may be obtained from www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region website at https
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan Mackey, 9075867228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that each regional fishery management council submit any FMP amendment it prepares to NMFS for review and approval, disapproval, or partial approval by the Secretary of Commerce Secretary. The Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires that NMFS, upon receiving an FMP amendment, immediately publish a document in the Federal SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

15:31 Sep 16, 2021

Jkt 253001

Register announcing that the amendment is available for public review and comment.
The Notice of Availability NOA for the Amendments was published in the Federal Register on June 14, 2021 86
FR 31474 with a 60-day comment period that ended on August 13, 2021.
NMFS received no comments during the public comment period on the NOA.
NMFS determined that the Amendments are consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws, and the Secretary approved the Amendments on September 13, 2021. The June 14, 2021, NOA contains additional information on this action. No changes to Federal regulations are necessary to implement the Amendments.
NMFS manages the crab, scallop, and salmon fisheries in Alaskas exclusive economic zone under the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs. The Council prepared these FMPs under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and implementing the FMPs appear at 50
CFR parts 600, 679, and 680.
Section 303a11 of the MagnusonStevens Act requires that any FMP
establish a standardized bycatch reporting methodology SBRM to assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery, and include conservation and management measures that, to the extent practicable and in the following priority: A Minimize bycatch, and B minimize the mortality of bycatch that cannot be avoided 16
U.S.C. 1853a11.
On January 19, 2017, NMFS
published a final rule 82 FR 6317
establishing national guidance for compliance with this requirement. As required by 50 CFR 600.1610b, regional fishery management councils, in coordination with NMFS, must review their FMPs and make any necessary changes so all FMPs are consistent with the guidance by February 21, 2022.
The national guidance, codified at 50
CFR 600.1605a, defines an SBRM as an established, consistent procedure or procedures used to collect, record, and report bycatch data in a fishery. This information, in conjunction with other relevant sources, is used to assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery and inform the development of conservation and management measures to minimize bycatch. The regulations require that an FMP identify the required procedure or procedures that constitutes the SBRM for the fishery and explain how the procedure meets
PO 00000

Frm 00053

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

51833

the purpose to collect, record, and report bycatch data.
The SBRM final rule requires the Council to explain how the SBRMs meet the stated purpose in the rule based on an analysis of four considerations: 1
Characteristics of bycatch in the fishery, 2 the feasibility of the reporting methodology, 3 the uncertainty of data resulting from the methodology, and 4
how the data will be used to assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery 50 CFR 600.1610a. The Council must address these considerations when reviewing or establishing an SBRM.
In February 2020, the Council received a report on current FMPs managed by the Council and their consistency with the SBRM final rule.
At that meeting, the Council determined that the FMPs for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area, Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska, and Fish Resources of the Arctic Management Area were in compliance with the SBRM final rule.
The Council also determined that the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs needed to be updated to explicitly identify the SBRMs to be consistent with the SBRM
final rule and should therefore be amended.
The Council took final action at its February 2021 meeting. In taking final action, the Council noted that changes to the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs were necessary to ensure those FMPs are consistent with the MagnusonStevens Act and the SBRM final rule.
During deliberation, the Council recognized that the Crab, Scallop, and Salmon FMPs currently contain management measures such as the State of Alaska States Scallop and Crab Observer Programs, industry reports, and fish tickets that provide SBRMs consistent with the national guidance.
However, these are not explicitly identified as the SBRM in each FMP.
The Council recommended the three FMPs be amended to explicitly state the SBRMs and explain how they meet the purpose of collecting, recording, and reporting bycatch data. The Council also noted that the descriptions of the management measures that contribute to the SBRM such as the Crab Observer Program may be outdated. The Council indicated that the description of these management measures may be updated as the FMPs are amended by this action, and any such updates will be consistent with the SBRM regulations and be done in coordination with the State. Updates to the language of management measures for SBRM consistency will not add any new reporting requirements.

E:FRFM17SER1.SGM

17SER1