Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 8, 2021 / Notices metrics more broadly measure service that may relate to or involve FMLM
service, such as metrics on car trip plan compliance? Who would use any such information or measurements, and how?
What are the specific benefits, if any, that would arise from the use of any suggested metrics?
Would reports to the Board, shipper surveys, reports directly to individual shippers, or some other type of information be helpful to clarify the issue?
The above list of questions is nonexhaustivecommenters should feel free to provide any information they believe will be helpful to the Board as it considers issues related to FMLM
service.
Some of the issues that have been raised with the Board by stakeholders and that commenters may wish to comment on, if pertinent to them, include a switching, including missed switches and/or inconsistent switches;
b modified service plans at local yards such modified plans may reduce the number of service days per week, increase the number of service days per week, or change the timing of service morning versus night; c car delivery, such as the delivery of cars carrying a different commodity, delivery of a different type of car than the cars ordered, or delivery of fewer or more cars than were ordered; d extended dwell times at railroad facilities local to shipper/receiver locations; and e discrepancies in information between the railroad and the rail customer as to the location of cars between the local yard and the shippers facility.
Carrier data tracking. As indicated by AARs letter, carriers track some information related to FMLM service, and the Board could consider extant data in evaluating comments on the design of metrics. The Board seeks comment regarding the following questions:
What data do Class I carriers track that are relevant to FMLM service?
What aspects of these data do Class I carriers make available to their customers?
To the extent that Class I carriers collect certain information, what uniformity issues may exist related to that data that may affect reporting to the Board?
Trade-offs. Finally, the Board seeks comment on the trade-offs of any suggestions.
Factoring in the information that carriers already track, what additional burden would be associated with providing any suggested information or measurements?

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:21 Sep 07, 2021

Jkt 253001

If aggregated reports are suggested, what, if any, are the drawbacks of aggregation?
If individual reports directly to shippers are suggested, what, if any, are the drawbacks of such approach, particularly in comparison to reporting directly to the Board, as was required in United States Rail Service Issues Performance Data Reporting, Docket No.
EP 724?
How should the Board consider relative burden based on the type of carrier involved in the transportation e.g., Class II or III railroad?
Interested persons may file comments by October 18, 2021. If any comments are filed, replies will be due by November 16, 2021.
It is ordered:
1. Comments are due October 18, 2021. Replies are due November 16, 2021.
2. This decision is effective on its service date.
Decided: August 31, 2021.
By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz.
Regena Smith-Bernard, Clearance Clerk.
FR Doc. 202119362 Filed 9721; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 491501P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Docket No. FAA20210802

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Training and Qualification Requirements for Check Airmen and Flight Instructors Federal Aviation Administration FAA, DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
AGENCY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget OMB
approval to renew an information collection. The collection involves the reporting requirements to ensure the check pilots and instructors are adequately trained and checked/
evaluated to ensure they are capable and competent to perform the duties and responsibilities required by the air carrier to meet the regulations.
Experienced pilots who would otherwise qualify as flight instructors or check airmen, but who may not
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00101

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

50423

medically eligible to hold the requisite medical certificate are mandated to keep records that may be inspected by the FAA to certify eligibility to perform flight instructor or check airmen functions.
Written comments should be submitted by November 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
By Electronic Docket:
www.regulations.gov Enter docket number into search field.
By mail: Sheri A. Martin, Federal Aviation Administration, Safety Standards, AFS200 Division, 777 S
Aviation Blvd., Suite 150, El Segundo, CA 90245.
By fax: 4244057218.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin M. Donohue by email at:
kevin.donohue@faa.gov; phone: 316
9411223
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection, including a Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for FAAs performance; b the accuracy of the estimated burden; c ways for FAA to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and d ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMBs clearance of this information collection.
OMB Control Number: 21200600.
Title: Training and Qualification Requirements for Check Airmen and Flight Instructors.
Form Numbers: There are no forms associated with this collection of information.
Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
Background: Federal Aviation Regulations FAR parts 121.411d, 121.412d, 135.337d, and 135.338d require the collection of this data. This collection is necessary to insure that instructors and check airmen have completed necessary training and checking required to perform instructor and check airmen functions.
Respondents: There are approximately 15,925 check airmen and flight instructors.
Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 seconds.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 66
hours.
DATES:

E:FRFM08SEN1.SGM

08SEN1