Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Rules and Regulations Executive Order 12866. For these reasons, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use 66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001.
In addition, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., because the action addresses only the timing of submittals required by the Clean Air Act. For the same reason, this action does not have regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044.
Executive Order 13175 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000 requires the EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications. Policies that have tribal implications is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. There are no Indian reservation lands or other areas where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction within the Eastern Kern ozone nonattainment area, and thus, this action does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175.
This action also does not have federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999. This action does not alter the relationship, or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997. The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks such that the analysis required under section 5501 of the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This action does not concern
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:08 Aug 25, 2021

Jkt 253001

an environmental health risk or safety risk.
As this action establishes a deadline for the submittal of CAA required plans and information, the requirements of section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq..
Executive Order 12898 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994 establishes Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. This action addresses the timing for the submittal of Severe area ozone planning requirements, and we find that it does not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental health effects on minority populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
8042.
Under section 307b1 of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 25, 2021.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may
PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

47581

not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements see section 307b2.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 19, 2021.
Deborah Jordan, Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
FR Doc. 202118344 Filed 82521; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

FEDERAL ACQUISITION SECURITY
COUNCIL
41 CFR Parts 201 and 2011
Federal Acquisition Security Council Rule Federal Acquisition Security Council.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

As authorized by the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018 FASCSA, the Federal Acquisition Security Council FASC is issuing this final rule to implement the requirements of the laws that govern the operation of the FASC, the sharing of supply chain risk information, and the exercise of the FASCs authorities to recommend issuance of removal and exclusion orders to address supply chain security risks. This rule finalizes the interim final rule and corrects the codification structure of the interim final rule.
DATES: Effective September 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kosta I. Kalpos, 2028819601, Konstandinos.I.Kalpos@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:

I. Background Information and communications technology and services ICTS are essential to the proper functioning of U.S. Government information systems.
The U.S. Governments efforts to evaluate threats to and vulnerabilities in ICTS supply chains have historically been ad hoc, undertaken by individual or small groups of agencies to address specific supply chain security risks.
Because of the scale of supply chain risks faced by Government agencies, and the need for Government-wide coordination, Congress adopted new legislation in 2018 to improve executive branch coordination, supply chain information sharing, and actions to address supply chain risks.

E:FRFM26AUR1.SGM

26AUR1