Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 153 / Thursday, August 12, 2021 / Proposed Rules the proposed determination, if adopted, would have no significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared an IRFA for this proposed determination. DOE will transmit this certification and supporting statement of factual basis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for review under 5
U.S.C. 605b.

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1

C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act Manufacturers of microwave ovens must certify to DOE that their products comply with any applicable energy conservation standards. To certify compliance, manufacturers must first obtain test data for their products according to the DOE test procedures, including any amendments adopted for those test procedures. DOE has established regulations for the certification and recordkeeping requirements for all covered consumer products and commercial equipment, including microwave ovens. See generally 10 CFR part 429. The collection-of-information requirement for the certification and recordkeeping is subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act PRA. This requirement has been approved by OMB under OMB control number 19101400. Public reporting burden for the certification is estimated to average 35 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE is analyzing this proposed action in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
NEPA and DOEs NEPA
implementing regulations 10 CFR part 1021. DOEs regulations include a categorical exclusion for actions which are interpretations or rulings with respect to existing regulations. 10 CFR
part 1021, subpart D, appendix A4. DOE
anticipates that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion A4 because it is an interpretation or ruling regarding an existing regulation and otherwise meets the requirements for application of a
VerDate Sep<11>2014

22:35 Aug 11, 2021

Jkt 253001

categorical exclusion. See 10 CFR
1021.410. DOE will complete its NEPA
review before issuing the final action.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
E.O. 13132, Federalism, 64 FR
43255 Aug. 10, 1999, imposes certain requirements on Federal agencies formulating and implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have Federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order also requires agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental consultation process it will follow in the development of such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE has examined this proposed determination and has tentatively determined that it would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. EPCA
governs and prescribes Federal preemption of State regulations as to energy conservation for the products that are the subject of this proposed rule. States can petition DOE for exemption from such preemption to the extent, and based on criteria, set forth in EPCA. 42 U.S.C. 6297 Therefore, no further action is required by E.O. 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the promulgation of new regulations, section 3a of E.O.
12988, Civil Justice Reform, imposes on Federal agencies the general duty to adhere to the following requirements:
1 Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, 2 write regulations to minimize litigation, 3 provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard, and 4
promote simplification and burden reduction. 61 FR 4729 Feb. 7, 1996.
Regarding the review required by section 3a, section 3b of E.O. 12988
specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: 1 Clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if any, 2 clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or regulation, 3
provides a clear legal standard for
PO 00000

Frm 00026

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

44311

affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction, 4
specifies the retroactive effect, if any, 5
adequately defines key terms, and 6
addresses other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. Section 3c of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in section 3a and section 3b to determine whether they are met or it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law, this proposed determination meets the relevant standards of E.O. 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 UMRA requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the private sector. Public Law 1044, sec.
201 codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531. For a proposed regulatory action likely to result in a rule that may cause the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year adjusted annually for inflation, section 202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy. 2 U.S.C. 1532a, b The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed significant intergovernmental mandate, and requires an agency plan for giving notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small governments before establishing any requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect them. On March 18, 1997, DOE
published a statement of policy on its process for intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62 FR
12820. DOEs policy statement is also available at https energy.gov/sites/
prod/files/gcprod/documents/umra_
97.pdf.
This proposed determination does not contain a Federal intergovernmental mandate, nor is it expected to require expenditures of $100 million or more in any one year by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector. As a result, the analytical requirements of UMRA do not apply.

E:FRFM12AUP1.SGM

12AUP1