Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

41916

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 147 / Wednesday, August 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Information Contact section of this preamble for more information.
V. Proposed Action EPA is proposing to approve and incorporate into South Carolinas SIP
the aforementioned changes to South Carolina Regulation 6162.1, Section I
Definitions, state effective on April 24, 2020. EPA has determined that these revisions meet the applicable requirements of Section 110 of the CAA
and the applicable regulatory requirements at 40 CFR part 51.

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:17 Aug 03, 2021

Jkt 253001

Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
In addition, this proposed rule for South Carolina does not have Tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000, because it does not have substantial direct effects on an Indian Tribe. The Catawba Indian Nation Reservation is located within the state of South Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code Ann. 2716120, all state and local environmental laws and regulations apply to the Catawba Indian Nation and Reservation and are fully enforceable by all relevant state and local agencies and authorities. EPA
notes this action will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 22, 2021.
John Blevins, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
FR Doc. 202116032 Filed 8321; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
MB Docket No. 2121921; RM11891; DA
21921; FR ID 41251

Television Broadcasting Services Henderson, Nevada Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:

The Commission has before it a petition for rulemaking filed by KVVU
Broadcasting Corporation Petitioner, the licensee of KVVU FOX, channel 9, Henderson, Nevada. The Petitioner requests the substitution of channel 24
for channel 9 in the DTV Table of Allotments.

SUMMARY:

Comments must be filed on or before September 3, 2021 and reply
DATES:

PO 00000

Frm 00010

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

comments on or before September 20, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 45
L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for the Petitioner as follows:
Christina Burrow, Esq., Cooley LLP, 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at 202
4181647; or Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In support of its channel substitution request, the Petitioner states that the Commission has recognized that VHF channels have certain characteristics that pose challenges for their use in providing digital television service, including propagation characteristics that allow undesired signals and noise to be receivable at relatively far distances and nearby electrical devices to cause interference. According to the Petitioner, it has received numerous complaints of poor or no reception from viewers, and explains the importance of a strong over-the-air signal in the Las Vegas area during emergencies, when, it states, cable and satellite service may go out of operation. It also explained that improving KVVUs signal would serve the public interest because more than 25
percent of viewers in the Las Vegas area receive television broadcast signals over-the-air. Finally, the Petitioner recognized that the channel 24 noise limited contour would not fully encompass the existing channel 9
contour, but stated that only 152
persons in the lost coverage area would lose service from KVVUTV, a number the Commission considers de minimis, and no viewers would lose access to their first or second over-the-air television service. The Petitioner also performed an analysis using the Commissions TVStudy software, which indicated that Petitioners proposal would result in no more than 0.5
percent new interference to any surrounding co-channel or adjacentchannel facility.
This is a synopsis of the Commissions Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 21921;
RM11891; DA 21921, adopted July 27, 2021, and released July 28, 2021. The full text of this document is available for download at https www.fcc.gov/edocs.
To request materials in accessible formats braille, large print, computer diskettes, or audio recordings, please send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Government Affairs
E:FRFM04AUP1.SGM

04AUP1