Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

38255

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 20, 2021 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1AREAS PROPOSED FOR EXCLUSION BY CRITICAL HABITAT UNIT
Areas meeting the definition of critical habitat, in acres hectares
Unit
Specific area
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10

NCO 4
NCO 5
ORC 1
ORC 2
ORC 3
ORC 5
ORC 6
WCS 1
WCS 2
WCS 3
WCS 4
WCS 5
WCS 6
ECS 1
ECS 2
KLW 1
KLW 2
KLW 3
KLW 4
KLW 5
KLE 1
KLE 2
KLE 3
KLE 4
KLE 5
KLE 6

Areas proposed for exclusion, in acres hectares
179,745 72,740
142,937 57,845
110,657 44,781
261,405 105,787
203,681 82,427
176,905 71,591
81,900 33,144
92,586 37,468
150,105 60,745
319,736 129,393
379,130 153,429
356,415 144,236
99,558 40,290
127,801 51,719
66,086 26,744
147,326 59,621
148,929 60,674
143,862 58,219
158,299 64,061
31,085 12,580
242,338 98,071
101,942 41,255
111,410 45,086
254,442 102,969
38,283 15,493
167,849 67,926

Rationale for proposed exclusion
1,840 744
8,780 3,553
1,280 518
7,906 3,199
4,956 2,006
14,998 6,070
4,300 1,740
881 356
1,083 438
1,923 778
6 2
2 <1
18,529 7,498
16,622 6,727
2,380 963
14,887 6,025 <1 <1
1,656 670
785 318 <1 <1
30 12
29,958 12,124
48,334 19,560
1 <1
12,241 4,954
11,403 4,614

BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM
BLM

Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest Harvest
Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land Land
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base/Indian Base/Indian Base.
Base/Indian Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base/Indian Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.
Base/Indian Base/Indian Base.
Base.
Base.
Base.

Lands.
Lands.
Lands.

Lands.

Lands.
Lands.

TABLE 8 ADDENDUM 1ADDITIONAL LANDS PROPOSED FOR EXCLUSION FROM THE DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT
UNDER SECTION 4b2 OF THE ACT
Type of agreement
Critical habitat unit
Resource Management Plan

NCO
ORC
WCS
ECS
KLW
KLE
ORC
KLE
KLW

OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR
OR

BLM Harvest Land Base
BLM Harvest Land Base
BLM Harvest Land Base
BLM Harvest Land Base
BLM Harvest Land Base
BLM Harvest Land Base
CTCLUSI2
CCBUTI3
CCBUTI

10,620
27,866
22,438
19,002
13,508
91,184
5,575
10,783
3,821

4,298
11,277
9,080
7,690
5,46
36,901
2,256
4,364
1,546

204,797

82,879

Tribal lands

Total additional lands proposed for exclusion under section 4b2 of the Act.

State
Landowner/agency
Acres
Hectares
1 This
table is an addendum to table 8 of the December 4, 2012, final rule 77 FR 71876; table 8 appears at 77 FR 7194871949.
is the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians.
is the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians.
4 Total is slightly higher due to rounding of partial acres.
2 CTCLUSI

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

3 CCBUTI

We specifically solicit comments on the inclusion or exclusion of these areas from the critical habitat designation for the northern spotted owl 77 FR 71876, December 4, 2012, codified at 50 CFR
17.95b. These proposed exclusions are based on new information that has become available since the December 4, 2012, critical habitat designation for the northern spotted owl, including the BLMs 2016 revision to its RMPs for western Oregon BLM 2016a, b and the Western Oregon Tribal Fairness Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:23 Jul 19, 2021

Jkt 253001

Pub. L. 115103. In the paragraphs below, we provide a detailed analysis of our consideration of these lands for exclusion under section 4b2 of the Act.
Exclusions Based on Other Relevant Impacts Under section 4b2 of the Act, we consider any other relevant impacts, in addition to economic impacts and impacts on national security. We consider a number of factors, including
PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

whether there are permitted conservation plans covering the species in the area such as HCPs, safe harbor agreements, or candidate conservation agreements with assurances, or whether there are other conservation agreements and partnerships that would be encouraged by designation of, or exclusion from, critical habitat. In addition, we consider any Tribal forest management plans and partnerships and consider the government-to-government relationship of the United States with
E:FRFM20JYP1.SGM

20JYP1