Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

32774

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12866, the Office of Management and Budget OMB must determine whether this regulatory action is significant and, therefore, subject to the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by OMB. Section 3f of Executive Order 12866 defines a significant regulatory action as an action likely to result in a rule that may 1 Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities in a material way also referred to as an economically significant rule;
2 Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency;
3 Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or 4 Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the Presidents priorities, or the principles stated in the Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by OMB under section 3 f of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed this regulatory action under Executive Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles, structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in Executive Order 12866.
To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order 13563 requires that an agency 1 Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs recognizing that some benefits and costs are difficult to quantify;
2 Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society, consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into accountamong other things and to the extent practicablethe costs of cumulative regulations;
3 In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select those approaches that maximize net benefits including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity;
4 To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must adopt; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014

15:58 Jun 22, 2021

Jkt 253001

5 Identify and assess available alternatives to direct regulation, including economic incentivessuch as user fees or marketable permitsto encourage the desired behavior, or provide information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency to use the best available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future benefits and costs as accurately as possible. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these techniques may include identifying changing future compliance costs that might result from technological innovation or anticipated behavioral changes.
We are issuing this final priority only on a reasoned determination that the benefits will justify the costs. In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those approaches that maximize net benefits.
Based on the analysis that follows, the Department believes that this regulatory action is consistent with the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We have also determined that this regulatory action will not unduly interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the exercise of their governmental functions.
In accordance with these Executive orders, the Department has assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as necessary for administering the Departments programs and activities. The costs will include the time and effort in responding to the priority for entities that choose to respond. Potential benefits include increased access to the educational, training, and competitive integrated employment opportunities under the Rehabilitation Act, as amended by WIOA, for individuals with disabilities, through improved CAP
professional development and institutional capacity nationwide.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and actions for this program.

PO 00000

Frm 00054

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification: The Secretary certifies that this final regulatory action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The U.S. Small Business Administration Size Standards define small entities as for-profit or nonprofit institutions with total annual revenue below $7,000,000 or, if they are institutions controlled by small governmental jurisdictions that are comprised of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of less than 50,000.
The small entities that this final regulatory action will affect are States and public or private nonprofit agencies and organizations, including Indian Tribes and institutions of higher education, which are the eligible applicants for this program. We believe that the costs imposed on an applicant by the final priority are limited to the paperwork burden related to preparing an application and that the benefits of the final priority will outweigh any costs incurred by the applicant. There are very few entities that could provide the type of technical assistance required under the final priority. For these reasons, the final priority will not impose a burden on a significant number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
The priority contains information collection requirements that are approved by OMB under OMB control number 18200018; the priority does not affect the currently approved data collection.
Accessible Format: On request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, individuals with disabilities can obtain this document in an accessible format. The Department will provide the requestor with an accessible format that may include Rich Text Format RTF or text format txt, a thumb drive, an MP3 file, braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format PDF. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal
E:FRFM23JNR1.SGM

23JNR1