Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations ofand involvement inthe Great Lakes.
Response: One of the strengths of the WSCNMS designation is the many opportunities to partner with, leverage, and complement assets in each of the sanctuary communities. Per final management plan Strategy SO1, the sanctuary will Develop a NOAA
presence within sanctuary communities that supports the sanctuarys mission and infrastructure needs, and that recognizes, leverages, and complements individual assets in sanctuary communities. NOAA will develop the strategic plan supporting Strategy SO1
after designation in cooperation with local communities, other appropriate partners, and the Sanctuary Advisory Council to ensure that NOAA is capitalizing on existing efforts and institutions in the region.
67. Comment: NOAA received one comment stating that the proposal should provide more specificity about educational programming and technology for K12.
Response: NOAAs final management plan is the initial management plan for this site, and as such describes general objectives for education and outreach activities. As sanctuary staff are hired and as NOAA engages with its education partners after designation, more specificity will emerge for the sanctuarys education and outreach activities.
68. Comment: NOAA received one comment suggesting that the sanctuary should be named Wisconsin Marine Protection Area as the name is shorter and easier to say, it would result in less clutter on a map, and people could identify the name easier.
Response: Community and partner discussions during a sanctuary branding workshop sponsored by the Wisconsin Department of Tourism produced the name Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary, which NOAA proposes as the sanctuarys official name. The new name reflects the sanctuarys cultural heritage focus, is responsive to community input, and is conducive to marketing and branding efforts.
69. Comment: NOAA received one comment stating that Sheboygan would be the ideal location for a sanctuary office because it is centrally located, has the most developed riverfront, has Blue Harbor Resort and charter fishing fleets, and is the largest of the cities in the proposed sanctuary. NOAA also received other comments identifying specific communities in a similar way, such as Port Washington.
Response: One of the strengths of the WSCNMS designation is the many
VerDate Sep<11>2014

15:58 Jun 22, 2021

Jkt 253001

opportunities to partner with, leverage, and complement assets in each of the sanctuary communities. Per final management plan Strategy SO1, the sanctuary will Develop a NOAA
presence within sanctuary communities that supports the sanctuarys mission and infrastructure needs, and that recognizes, leverages, and complements individual assets in sanctuary communities. NOAA has not made any decisions about sanctuary office locations.
70. Comment: NOAA received one comment from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency stating that NOAA
should address green building practices and climate change and greenhouse gases in the FEIS. EPA recommended that the FEIS explain the geographic and policy definitions of the term coastline as it applies to this proposed designation.
Response: The FEIS does not include a plan for facility construction or operation as part of the proposed action.
However, should NOAA propose any of these activities in the future, it will consider environmentally responsible practices suggested in EPAs recommendations. In using the term coastline, NOAA does not define it as a legal term; instead it is used generally to refer to the land-water interface. The shore side boundary is defined as the LWD.
V. Classification 1. National Marine Sanctuaries Act NOAA has determined that the designation of the Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast National Marine Sanctuary will not have a negative impact on the National Marine Sanctuary System and that sufficient resources exist to effectively implement sanctuary management plans. The final finding for NMSA section 304f is published on the ONMS website for Wisconsin Shipwreck Coast designation at http
sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/.
2. National Environmental Policy Act NOAA has prepared a final environmental impact statement to evaluate the environmental effects of the rulemaking and alternatives as required by NEPA 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. and the NMSA. The Notice of Availability is available at 85 FR 34625. NOAA has also prepared a Record of Decision ROD. Copies of the ROD and the FEIS
are available at the address and website listed in the ADDRESSES section of this rule.
3. Coastal Zone Management Act Section 307 of the Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA; 16 U.S.C.

PO 00000

Frm 00031

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

32751

1456 requires Federal agencies to consult with a states coastal program on potential Federal activities that have reasonably foreseeable effects on any coastal use or resource. Such activities must be consistent with approved state coastal policies to the maximum extent possible. Because WSCNMS
encompasses a portion of the Wisconsin state waters, NOAA submitted a copy of the proposed rule and supporting documents to the State of Wisconsin Coastal Zone Management Program for evaluation of Federal consistency under the CZMA. NOAA has presumed the states concurrence pursuant to 15 CFR
930.41a, whereby a federal agency may presume concurrence if a response is not received within 60 days.
4. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Impact This rule has been determined to be significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism Assessment NOAA has concluded that this regulatory action does not have federalism implications sufficient to warrant preparation of a federalism assessment under Executive Order 13132. These sanctuary regulations are intended only to supplement and complement existing state and local laws under the NMSA.
6. National Historic Preservation Act The National Historic Preservation Act NHPA; 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. is intended to preserve historical and archaeological sites in the United States of America. The act created the National Register of Historic Places, the list of National Historic Landmarks, and State Historic Preservation Offices. Section 106 of the NHPA requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties, and afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation ACHP a reasonable opportunity to comment. The historic preservation review process mandated by Section 106 is outlined in regulations issued by ACHP 36 CFR part 800 et seq.. In fulfilling its responsibilities under the NHPA, NOAA identified interested parties in addition to the State Historic Preservation Officer SHPO, and has completed the identification of historic properties and the assessment of the effects of the undertaking on such properties in scheduled consultations with those identified parties and the SHPO. NOAA received a response from the SHPO, dated May 5, 2017, agreeing that the proposed undertaking will have
E:FRFM23JNR1.SGM

23JNR1