Federal Register - May 25, 2021

Versione di testo Cosa è?Dateas è un sito indipendente non affiliato a entità governative. La fonte dei documenti PDF che pubblichiamo qui è l'entità governativa indicata in ciascuno di essi. Le versioni in testo sono trascrizioni che realizziamo per facilitare l'accesso e la ricerca di informazioni, ma possono contenere errori o non essere complete.

Source: Federal Register

27976

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
of 20 military students and eliminating the possible disadvantage to military students for not receiving face-to-face academic counseling, certain educational courses, and other support services on the military installations.
Neither action will increase or create a cost burden to the public.

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

Benefits The rule benefits educational institutions with a population of fewer than 20 military students as it allows them to provide face-to-face academic counseling and administrative support to its students at a DoD installation, regardless of the number of its military students enrolled at that installation.
This is a convenience to both educational institution and military students. Students will not have the added cost of having to leave their military installation, spending money for gas and travel to meet with their academic advisors. Additionally, there may be cost savings to the educational institutions, as the use of military facilities will preclude the need to secure and potentially pay for adequate facilities off the military installation.
Alternatives We have identified two alternatives:
1. No actionThe current rule would stand and only schools with 20 or more military students would be permitted to access the DoD installation to counsel their military students, thus sustaining an identified policy inequity. This action would not benefit the public because educational institutions would be denied access to meet with their military students if they have less than 20 students enrolled in their institutions. Military students will have the added cost of having to leave their installation, spend money for gas, and travel to meet with their academic advisors. Educational institutions will need to secure, and potentially pay for, adequate facilities off the military installation for counseling and administrative support.
2. Next best alternativeThe next best alternative is to incorporate this rule amendment into the full revision of the rule to occur at a later date. The rule has been identified as a priority for modification to increase effectiveness and improve efficiencies. The full revision is currently in the development stage. However, it will be a significant amount of time approximately 18
months to complete internal processes that will culminate in development of the rule. This would put military students, as well as educational institutions, at a disadvantage to not be able to meet for counseling and
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:05 May 24, 2021

Jkt 253001

academic support on the military installation simply because the number of military students enrolled at the educational institution is not 20 or more.
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
8042
Under the Congressional Review Act, a major rule may not take effect until at least 60 days after submission to Congress of a report regarding the rule.
A major rule is one that would have an annual effect on the economy of $100M
or more or have certain other impacts.
This rule amendment is not a major rule under the Congressional Review Act.
Public Law 96354, Regulatory Flexibility Act RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601
The RFA requires that each Federal agency analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses if a rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. This rule is not an economically significant regulatory action, and it will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Therefore, this rule is not subject to the requirements of the RFA.
Public Law 1044, Sec. 202, Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any one year of $100M in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation.
That threshold level is currently approximately $140M. This rule amendment will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
Public Law 96511, Paperwork Reduction Act 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35
This rule amendment does not contain a collection of information requirement, and will not impose additional information collection requirements on the public under Public Law 96511, Paperwork Reduction Act 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism This rule amendment has been examined for its impact under E.O.
13132, and it does not contain policies that have federalism implications that would have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of powers and
PO 00000

Frm 00004

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

responsibilities among the various levels of Government. Therefore, consultation with State and local officials is not required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 68
Adult education, Armed forces, Colleges and universities, Education, Educational study programs, Government contracts, Military personnel, Student aid.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DoD amends 32 CFR part 68
as follows:
PART 68VOLUNTARY EDUCATION
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 68 is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 10 U.S.C. 2005, 2006a, 2007.
68.6

Amended
2. Section 68.6 is amended by removing paragraph d2 and redesignating paragraphs d3 through 6 as paragraphs d2 through 5, respectively.

Dated: May 19, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
FR Doc. 202110969 Filed 52421; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 500106P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR10OAR20190599, FRL10022
46Region 10

Air Plan Approval; OR; Smoke Management Revision Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is approving Oregon State Implementation Plan SIP revisions submitted on November 3, 2014, and September 27, 2019. The submitted revisions incorporate by reference the most recent updates to Oregons Smoke Management Plan. EPA is acting only on the most recent version of such regulations as the previous versions are no longer in effect as a matter of state law. EPA is also making technical corrections related to previous approvals of components of Oregons SIP. EPA has determined that the changes are consistent with Clean Air Act requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 24, 2021.
SUMMARY:

E:FRFM25MYR1.SGM

25MYR1

Riguardo a questa edizione

Federal Register - May 25, 2021

TitoloFederal Register

PaeseStati Uniti

Data25/05/2021

Conteggio pagine278

Numero di edizioni7798

Prima edizione14/03/1936

Ultima edizione18/06/2026

Scarica questa edizione

Altre edizioni

<<<Mayo 2021>>>
DLMMJVS
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031