Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

27545

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 97 / Friday, May 21, 2021 / Proposed Rules 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The state provided public notice of the revisions from May 01, 2019, to August 01, 2019, and held a public hearing on July 25, 2019. The state received and addressed five comments four being from the EPA. As explained in more detail in the TSD
which is part of this docket, the SIP
revision submission meets the substantive requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to amend the Missouri SIP by approving the States request to revise 10 CSR 105.442, Control of Emissions From Lithographic and Letterpress Printing Operations. Approval of these revisions will ensure consistency between state and federally-approved rules. The EPA has determined that these changes meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act and will not have a negative impact to air quality.
The EPA is processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments on the action. Final rulemaking will occur after consideration of any comments.
VII. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the Missouri State Implementation Plan described in the proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information.

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410k;
40 CFR 52.02a. Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPAs role is to approve state choices, if they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act NTTA because this
rulemaking does not involve technical standards; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 17, 2021.
Edward H. Chu, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AAMissouri 2. In 52.1320, the table in paragraph c is amended by revising entry 10
5.442 to read as follows:

52.1320

Identification of plan.

c

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

Chapter 5Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area

105.442

VerDate Sep<11>2014

Control of Emissions from Lithographic and Letterpress Printing Operations.

16:41 May 20, 2021

Jkt 253001

PO 00000

01/30/2020

Date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register, Federal Register citation of the final rule.

Frm 00011

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

E:FRFM21MYP1.SGM

21MYP1