Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

25809

Proposed Rules
Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 89
Tuesday, May 11, 2021

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 8 CFR Parts 103, 212 and 274
CIS No. 257215; DHS Docket No. USCIS
20150006
RIN 1615AC04

Removal of International Entrepreneur Parole Program U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security DHS is withdrawing a proposed rule that published on May 29, 2018. The NPRM
had proposed removing DHS regulations pertaining to the international entrepreneur parole program. Those regulations guide the adjudication of significant public benefit parole requests made by certain noncitizen entrepreneurs of start-up entities in the United States.
DATES: DHS withdraws the proposed rule published May 29, 2018 at 83 FR
24415 as of May 11, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn proposed rule is available at http www.regulations.gov. Please search for docket number USCIS2015
0006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Nimick, Business and Foreign Workers Division Chief, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS, 5900
Capital Gateway Drive, Camp Springs, MD 20746; telephone 2407213000
this is not a toll-free number.
Individuals with hearing or speech impairments may access the telephone numbers above via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 18778895627 TTY/TDD.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 29, 2018, DHS published a notice of SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:39 May 10, 2021

Jkt 253001

proposed rulemaking NPRM or proposed rule titled Removal of International Entrepreneur Parole Program in the Federal Register 83 FR
24415. That rule proposed to revise DHS regulations governing adjudication of significant public benefit parole requests made by certain noncitizen entrepreneurs of start-up entities in the United States. Specifically, if finalized, the rule would have removed the international entrepreneur parole program IE parole program from DHS
regulations. In response to the May 2018
NPRM, DHS received 892 comments during the 30-day public comment period. The overwhelming majority of commenters opposed the proposed removal of the IE parole program.
Approximately 8 percent of commenters expressed support for the rules removal of the IE parole program from the regulations and/or offered suggestions for improvement. Nearly 87
percent of commenters expressed general opposition to the rule that would have removed the IE parole program, without suggestions for improvement. Around 3 percent of commenters expressed mixed opinions on the rule and 2 percent were out of scope. Comments may be reviewed at the Federal Docket Management System FDMS at http www.regulations.gov, docket number USCIS20150006.
Commenters who opposed the rule did so primarily on the basis that removing the IE parole program would lead to unrealized economic benefits, damage U.S. innovation and entrepreneurship, and harm noncitizen startup founders. Additionally, commenters disagreed with DHSs assertion that parole is not an appropriate mechanism for a program promoting entrepreneurs, and they further argued that IE parole is within the scope of DHS parole authority.
Commenters also stated that DHS
should not, as one of the proposed means of winding down the program, automatically terminate IE parole granted to individuals, arguing this would lead to a significant burden to entrepreneurs, their startup entities, and the individuals employed by their businesses. In addition, commenters believed the May 2018 NPRMs statutory and regulatory reviews, required by Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, did not take into account the full costs of removing the IE parole program.

PO 00000

Frm 00001

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

They argued that there would be significant costs from losing additional funding from current and future investors, as well as costs related to the viability and continued operation of the start-up entity. Commenters also felt the May 2018 NPRM did not fully consider costs to small businesses, nor did it provide less onerous alternatives, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act RFA.
The NPRM was issued subsequent to Executive Order 13767, Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements, issued on January 25, 2017. This Executive Order had directed Federal agencies to ensure that parole authority under section 212d5 of the INA is exercised only on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the plain language of the statute, and in all circumstances only when an individual demonstrates urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit derived from such parole.
On February 2, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14010, Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework to Address the Causes of Migration, to Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and to Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border.
This Executive Order revoked Executive Order 13767. In addition, on February 2, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14012, Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans. This Executive Order directed Federal Agencies to identify any agency actions that fail to promote access to the legal immigration system.
In light of the recent Executive Orders, DHS has reviewed the May 2018
NPRM and public comments that were overwhelmingly in opposition to the NPRM and has decided to withdraw that NPRM. DHS believes that the existing regulations in 8 CFR 212.19
appropriately guide the exercise of discretion, on a case-by-case basis, when considering requests for parole filed by noncitizen entrepreneurs. Such applications will continue to be decided consistent with the Secretarys statutory authority to grant parole on a case-bycase basis when it is determined that the applicant will provide a significant public benefit and that the applicant merits a favorable exercise of discretion.

E:FRFM11MYP1.SGM

11MYP1