Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

24326

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 86 / Thursday, May 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
to consider the impact of their proposals on small entities, consider alternatives to minimize that impact, and solicit public comment on their analyses. The RFA requires the assessment of the impact of a regulation on a wide range of small entities, including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
Accordingly, the Department examined this withdrawal to determine whether it will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The most recent data on private sector entities at the time this NPRM was drafted are from the 2017 Statistics of U.S. Businesses SUSB, which reports 5,996,900 private firms and 7,860,674
private establishments with paid employees.216 Of these, 5,976,761 firms and 6,512,802 establishments have fewer than 500 employees. The perentity cost for small business employers is the regulatory familiarization cost of $8.43, or the fully loaded mean hourly wage of a Compensation, Benefits, and Job Analysis Specialist $50.60
multiplied by 16 hour ten minutes.
Because this cost is minimal for small business entities, and well below one percent of their gross annual revenues, which is typically at least $100,000 per year for the smallest businesses, the Department certifies that this withdrawal will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES

VI. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 UMRA 217 requires agencies to prepare a written statement for rules with a federal mandate that may result in increased expenditures by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $165 million $100 million in 1995
dollars adjusted for inflation or more in at least one year.218 This statement must: 1 Identify the authorizing legislation; 2 present the estimated costs and benefits of the rule and, to the extent that such estimates are feasible and relevant, its estimated effects on the national economy; 3 summarize and evaluate state, local, and tribal government input; and 4 identify reasonable alternatives and select, or 216 Statistics of U.S. Businesses 2017, https
www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/econ/susb/2017susb-annual.html, 2016 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment Industry.
217 See 2 U.S.C. 1501.
218 Calculated using growth in the Gross Domestic Product deflator from 1995 to 2019. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Table 1.1.9. Implicit Price Deflators for Gross Domestic Product.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:26 May 05, 2021

Jkt 253001

explain the non-selection, of the least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative. This withdrawal is not expected to result in increased expenditures by the private sector or by state, local, and tribal governments of $165 million or more in any one year.
VII. Executive Order 13132, Federalism The Department has 1 reviewed this proposed withdrawal in accordance with Executive Order 13132 regarding federalism and 2 determined that it does not have federalism implications.
The Independent Contractor Rules withdrawal will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
VIII. Executive Order 13175, Indian Tribal Governments This withdrawal will not have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Signed this 30th day of April, 2021.
Jessica Looman, Principal Deputy Administrator, Wage and Hour Division.
FR Doc. 202109518 Filed 5521; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 451027P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100
Docket Number USCG20210103
RIN 1625AA08

Special Local Regulation; Choptank River, Between Trappe and Cambridge, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

The Coast Guard is establishing special local regulations for certain waters of the Choptank River.
This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters located between Trappe, Talbot County, MD, and Cambridge, Dorchester County, MD, during a swim event on May 16, 2021. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00024

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
through 10:30 a.m. on May 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https
www.regulations.gov, type USCG2021
0103 in the SEARCH box and click SEARCH. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email MST2 Shaun Landante, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region; telephone 4105762570, email D05-DG-SectorMD-NCR-MarineEvents@
uscg.mil.
DATES:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking PATCOM Patrol Commander Section U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History On February 15, 2021, the TCR Event Management of St. Michaels, MD, notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting the Maryland Freedom Swim from 7 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on May 16, 2021. The open water swim consists of approximately 200 participants competing on a designated 1.75-mile linear course. The course starts at the beach of Bill Burton Fishing Pier State Park at Trappe, MD, proceeds across the Choptank River along and between the fishing piers and the Senator Frederick C. Malkus, Jr. Memorial US50 Bridge, and finishes at the beach of the Dorchester County Visitors Center at Cambridge, MD. In response, on March 18, 2021, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking NPRM
titled Special Local Regulation;
Choptank River, Between Trappe and Cambridge, MD 86 FR 14714. There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this swim event. During the comment period that ended April 19, 2021, we received no comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553d3, the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Due to the date of the event, it would be impracticable to make the
E:FRFM06MYR1.SGM

06MYR1