Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

10208

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
other closures during the 2021 and 2022
fishing years as necessary for effective conservation and management.

tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES

Comments and Responses NMFS did not receive any comments during the public comment period for the proposed groundfish harvest specifications.
Classification NMFS has determined that the final harvest specifications are consistent with the FMP and with the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other applicable laws.
This final rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared an EIS for the Alaska groundfish harvest specifications and alternative harvest strategies see ADDRESSES and made it available to the public on January 12, 2007 72 FR
1512. On February 13, 2007, NMFS
issued the ROD for the EIS. In January 2021, NMFS prepared a SIR for this action to provide a subsequent assessment of the action and to address the need to prepare a Supplemental EIS
SEIS;40 CFR 1501.11b; 1502.9d1.
Copies of the EIS, ROD, and annual SIRs for this action are available from NMFS
see ADDRESSES. The Final EIS analyzes the environmental, social, and economic consequences of the groundfish harvest specifications and alternative harvest strategies on resources in the action area. Based on the analysis in the Final EIS, NMFS concluded that the preferred Alternative Alternative 2 provides the best balance among relevant environmental, social, and economic considerations and allows for continued management of the groundfish fisheries based on the most recent, best scientific information. The preferred alternative is a harvest strategy in which TACs are set at a level within the range of ABCs recommended by the Councils SSC; the sum of the TACs must achieve the OY
specified in the FMP. While the specific numbers that the harvest strategy produces may vary from year to year, the methodology used for the preferred harvest strategy remains constant.
The annual SIR evaluates the need to prepare a SEIS for the 2021 and 2022
groundfish harvest specifications. An SEIS should be prepared if 1 the agency makes substantial changes in the proposed action that are relevant to environmental concerns, or 2
significant new circumstances or information exist relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the proposed action or its impacts 40
CFR 1502.9d1. After reviewing the information contained in the SIR and
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:57 Feb 18, 2021

Jkt 253001

SAFE reports, the Regional Administrator has determined that 1
approval of the 2021 and 2022 harvest specifications, which were set according to the preferred harvest strategy in the EIS, does not constitute a substantial change in the action; and 2 there are no significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the action or its impacts. Additionally, the 2021 and 2022 harvest specifications will result in environmental, social, and economic impacts within the scope of those analyzed and disclosed in the EIS.
Therefore, an SEIS is not necessary to implement the 2021 and 2022 harvest specifications.
Section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act RFA 5 U.S.C. 604
requires that, when an agency promulgates a final rule under 5 U.S.C.
553, after being required by that section, or any other law, to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking, the agency shall prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis FRFA. The following constitutes the FRFA
prepared in the final action.
Section 604 of the RFA describes the required contents of a FRFA: 1 A
statement of the need for, and objectives of, the rule; 2 a statement of the significant issues raised by the public comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis IRFA, a statement of the assessment of the agency of such issues, and a statement of any changes made in the proposed rule as a result of such comments; 3
the response of the agency to any comments filed by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in response to the proposed rule, and a detailed statement of any change made to the proposed rule in the final rule as a result of the comments; 4 a description of and an estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule will apply or an explanation of why no such estimate is available; 5 a description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the rule, including an estimate of the classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirement and the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report or record; and 6 a description of the steps the agency has taken to minimize the significant economic impact on small entities consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statutes, including a statement of the factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative adopted in the final rule and why each one of the other significant alternatives to the rule considered by the agency that
PO 00000

Frm 00038

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

affect the impact on small entities was rejected.
A description of this action, its purpose, and its legal basis are contained at the beginning of the preamble to this final rule and are not repeated here.
NMFS published the proposed rule on December 3, 2020 85 FR 78076. NMFS
prepared an IRFA to accompany the proposed action, and included the IRFA
in the proposed rule. The comment period closed on January 4, 2021. No comments were received on the IRFA or on the economic impacts of the rule more generally. The Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration did not file any comments on the proposed rule.
The entities directly regulated by this action are: 1 Entities operating vessels with groundfish federal fishing permit FFPs catching FMP groundfish in Federal waters; 2 all entities operating vessels, regardless of whether they hold groundfish FFPs, catching FMP
groundfish in the State-waters parallel fisheries; and 3 all entities operating vessels fishing for halibut inside three miles 5.6 km of the shore whether or not they have FFPs.
For RFA purposes only, NMFS has established a small business size standard for businesses, including their affiliates, whose primary industry is commercial fishing see 50 CFR 200.2.
A business primarily engaged in commercial fishing NAICS code 11411
is classified as a small business if it is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in its field of operation including its affiliates, and has combined annual gross receipts not in excess of $11 million for all its affiliated operations worldwide.
Using the most recent data available 2019, the estimated number of directly regulated small entities include approximately 871 individual catcher vessel entities with gross revenues meeting small entity criteria. This estimate does not account for corporate affiliations among vessels, and for cooperative affiliations among fishing entities, since some of the fishing vessels operating in the GOA are members of AFA inshore pollock cooperatives, GOA rockfish cooperatives, or BSAI CR Program cooperatives. Vessels that participate in these cooperatives are considered to be large entities within the meaning of the RFA because the aggregate gross receipts of all participating members exceed the $11 million threshold. After accounting for membership in these cooperatives, there are an estimated 812 small CV and 5 small CP entities remaining in the GOA groundfish sector. However, the
E:FRFM19FER1.SGM

19FER1