Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations FR Doc. 202103034 Filed 21721; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 656050P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR09OAR20200364; FRL10018
18Region 9

Air Plan Approval; California; San Diego Air Pollution Control District Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District SDAPCD or District portion of the California State Implementation Plan SIP. This revision concerns the regulation of emissions of volatile organic compounds VOCs from large coating operations for wood products. We are
SUMMARY:

you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Schwartz, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: 415 9723286 or by email at schwartz.robert@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, we, us and our refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action On October 5, 2020 85 FR 62687, the EPA proposed to approve the rescission of the following rule from the California SIP.

Local agency
Rule No.

Rule title
Adopted
Request for rescission submitted
SDAPCD

67.11.1

Large Coating Operations for Wood Products

09/25/2002

03/04/2015

We proposed to approve the rescission of this rule because we determined that the SIP revision, i.e., rule rescission, complies with the relevant CAA requirements, including CAA sections 110l and 193. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses The EPAs proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section 110k3 of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the rescission of this rule from the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

approving the rescission of a local rule from the California SIP that is no longer needed to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act CAA
or the Act.
DATES: This rule will be effective on March 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPAR09OAR20200364. All documents in the docket are listed on the https www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https
www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. If
10025

In this rule, the EPA is amending regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. The EPA is removing SDAPCD Rule 67.11.1 as described in Table 1 of this preamble from the California State Implementation Plan, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:05 Feb 17, 2021

Jkt 253001

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
PO 00000

Frm 00015

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
E:FRFM18FER1.SGM

18FER1