Federal Register - February 18, 2021

Versione di testo Cosa è?Dateas è un sito indipendente non affiliato a entità governative. La fonte dei documenti PDF che pubblichiamo qui è l'entità governativa indicata in ciascuno di essi. Le versioni in testo sono trascrizioni che realizziamo per facilitare l'accesso e la ricerca di informazioni, ma possono contenere errori o non essere complete.

Source: Federal Register

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations c If the Associate General Counsel determines that a Governor is engaged in activity which involves a violation of federal statute or regulation, including the ethical conduct regulations contained in 5 CFR parts 2635 and 7001, or conduct which creates the appearance of such a violation, he or she shall bring this to the attention of the Governor or shall notify the General Counsel, the Chairman of the Board of Governors, or the Vice Chairman, as appropriate.

www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Chi, EPA Region 10, Air and Radiation Division, 1200 Sixth AvenueSuite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at 206553
1185, or chi.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever we, us, or our is used, it means the EPA.

Michael J. Elston, Secretary of the Board of Governors.

I. Background On July 27, 2020, the EPA proposed to approve the February 7, 2018 SIP
submission from Washington as meeting certain Clean Air Act CAA interstate transport requirements for the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS 85 FR 45146. The reasons for our proposed approval were stated in the proposed rulemaking and will not be re-stated here. The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking was reopened on September 22, 2020 85 FR 59486, due to an incorrect docket number, and closed on October 22, 2020. We received no comments. Therefore, we are finalizing our rulemaking as proposed.

FR Doc. 202100485 Filed 21721; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 771012P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR10OAR20180062; FRL10018
22Region 10

Air Plan Approval; Washington;
Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is approving the State Implementation Plan SIP revisions submitted by Washington on February 7, 2018 as meeting certain Clean Air Act CAA requirements for interstate transport of the 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide SO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAAQS. The EPA
has determined that emissions from Washington sources will not contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with the maintenance of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPAR10OAR20180062. All documents in the docket are listed on the https www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available at https

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:05 Feb 17, 2021

Jkt 253001

II. Final Action In this final action, the EPA is approving the February 7, 2018 SIP
submission from Washington as meeting the interstate transport requirements of CAA section 110a2DiI for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000

Frm 00005

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

10015

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note because application of the requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
In addition, this final action does not apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
8042.

E:FRFM18FER1.SGM

18FER1

Riguardo a questa edizione

Federal Register - February 18, 2021

TitoloFederal Register

PaeseStati Uniti

Data18/02/2021

Conteggio pagine172

Numero di edizioni7797

Prima edizione14/03/1936

Ultima edizione17/06/2026

Scarica questa edizione

Altre edizioni

<<<Febrero 2021>>>
DLMMJVS
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28