Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 17, 2021 / Proposed Rules Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch, Secretary.

Proposed Rules For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 64 as follows:
PART 64MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
1. Amend subpart HH by adding 64.6308 to read as follows:

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

64.6308 Review of Governance Authority decision to revoke an SPC token.

a Parties permitted to seek review of Governance Authority decision. 1 Any intermediate provider or voice service provider aggrieved by a Governance Authority decision to revoke that intermediate provider or voice service providers Service Provider Code SPC
token, must seek review from the Governance Authority and complete the appeals process established by the Governance Authority prior to seeking Commission review.
2 Any intermediate provider or voice service provider aggrieved by an action to revoke its SPC token taken by the Governance Authority, after exhausting the appeals process provided by the Governance Authority, may then seek review from the Commission, as set forth in this section.
b Filing deadlines. 1 An intermediate provider or voice service provider requesting Commission review of a Governance Authority decision to revoke that intermediate provider or voice service providers SPC token by the Commission, shall file such a request electronically in the designated Electronic Comment Filing System ECFS inbox within sixty days from the date the Governance Authority issues its final decision.
2 Parties shall adhere to the time periods for filing oppositions and replies set forth in 1.45.
c Filing requirements. 1 A request for review of a Governance Authority decision to revoke an intermediate provider or voice service providers SPC
token by the Commission shall be filed electronically in the designated ECFS
inbox. The request for review shall be captioned In the matter of Request for Review by name of party seeking review of Decision of the Governance Authority to Revoke an SPC Token.
2 A request for review shall contain:
i A statement setting forth the intermediate provider or voice service providers asserted basis for appealing the Governance Authoritys decision to revoke the SPC token;

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:07 Feb 16, 2021

Jkt 253001

ii A full statement of relevant, material facts with supporting affidavits and documentation, including any background information the intermediate provider or voice service provider deems useful to the Commissions review; and iii The question presented for review, with reference, where appropriate, to any underlying Commission rule or Governance Authority policy.
3 A copy of a request for review that is submitted to the Commission shall be served on the Governance Authority via sti-ga@atis.org or in accordance with any alternative delivery mechanism the Governance Authority may establish in its operating procedures.
d Review by the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission.
1 Requests for review of a Governance Authority decision to revoke an intermediate provider or voice service providers SPC token that are submitted to the Commission shall be considered and acted upon by the Wireline Competition Bureau, which shall issue a written decision; provided, however, that requests for review that raise novel questions of fact, law, or policy shall be considered by the full Commission.
2 An affected party may seek review of a decision issued under delegated authority by the Wireline Competition Bureau pursuant to the rules set forth in 1.115.
e Standard of review. 1 The Wireline Competition Bureau shall conduct de novo review of Governance Authority decisions to revoke an intermediate provider or voice service providers SPC token.
2 The Commission shall conduct de novo review of Governance Authority decisions to revoke an intermediate provider or voice service providers SPC
token that involve novel questions of fact, law, or policy; provided, however, that the Commission shall not conduct de novo review of decisions issued by the Wireline Competition Bureau under delegated authority.
f Status during pendency of a request for review and a Governance Authority decision. 1 When an intermediate provider or voice service provider has sought timely Commission review of a Governance Authority decision to revoke an intermediate provider or voice service providers SPC
token under this section, the intermediate provider or voice service provider shall not be considered to be in violation of the Commissions call authentication rules under 64.6301
until and unless the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission, pursuant to paragraph d1 of this
PO 00000

Frm 00018

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

9901

section, has upheld or otherwise decided not to overturn the Governance Authoritys decision.
2 In accordance with 1.102b and 1.106n, the effective date of any action pursuant to paragraph d of this section shall not be stayed absent order by the Wireline Competition Bureau or the Commission.
FR Doc. 202103043 Filed 21621; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 671201P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 648
Docket No. 2102080016; RTID 0648
XX065

Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fisheries; Proposed 2021
2026 Fishing Quotas National Marine Fisheries Service NMFS, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
AGENCY:

NMFS proposes status quo commercial quotas for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries for 2021 and projected status quo quotas for 20222026. This action is necessary to establish allowable harvest levels of Atlantic surfclams and ocean quahogs that will prevent overfishing and allow harvesting of optimum yield. This action would also continue to suspend the minimum shell size for Atlantic surfclams for the 2021 fishing year. The intended effect of this action is to provide benefit to the industry from stable quotas to maintain a consistent market.

SUMMARY:

Comments must be received by March 4, 2021.
ADDRESSES: An Environmental Assessment EA was prepared for the surfclam and ocean quahog specifications. Copies of the EA are available on request from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, Suite 201, 800
North State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
These documents are also accessible via the internet at http www.mafmc.org.
You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAANMFS
20200152, by the following method:
DATES:

E:FRFM17FEP1.SGM

17FEP1