Federal Register - February 11, 2021
Versione di testo Cosa è?Dateas è un sito indipendente non affiliato a entità governative. La fonte dei documenti PDF che pubblichiamo qui è l'entità governativa indicata in ciascuno di essi. Le versioni in testo sono trascrizioni che realizziamo per facilitare l'accesso e la ricerca di informazioni, ma possono contenere errori o non essere complete.
Source: Federal Register
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
9068
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices
3 the location of the device; and 4 the date of initial operation. Otherwise, the Commission permits providers to develop their own registration systems to facilitate provider control and interference resolution, providers should collect only such information that is reasonably related to achieving these dual goals. Wireless providers may determine how to collect such information and how to keep it up-todate. Section 90.219d5This rule requires operators of Part 90 Class B
signal boosters to register these devices in a searchable on-line database that will be maintained and operated by the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau via delegated authority from the Commission. The Commission believes this will be a valuable tool to resolve interference should it occur.
Certification Requirements: Sections 20.3, 20.21e2, 20.21e8iG, 20.21e9iH, 90.203These rules, in conjunction with the R&O, require that signal booster manufacturers demonstrate that they meet the new technical specifications using the existing and unchanged equipment authorization application, including submitting a technical document with the application for FCC equipment authorization that shows compliance of all antennas, cables and/or coupling devices with the requirements of 20.21e. The R&O further provides that manufacturers must make certain certifications when applying for device certification. Manufacturers must provide an explanation of all measures taken to ensure that the technical safeguards designed to inhibit harmful interference and protect wireless networks cannot be deactivated by the user. The R&O requires that manufacturers of Provider-Specific Consumer Signal Boosters may only be certificated with the consent of the licensee so the manufacturer must certify that it has obtained such consent as part of the equipment certification process. The R&O also requires that if a manufacturer claims that a device will not affect E911 communications, the manufacturer must certify this claim during the equipment certification process. Note: The application for equipment certification requirements are met under OMB Control Number 30600057, FCC Form 731.
Antenna Kitting Documentation Requirement: Sections 20.21e8iG, 20.21e9iHThe rules require that all consumer boosters must be sold with user manuals specifying all antennas and cables that meet the requirements of this section. Part 90 Licensee Consent Documentation Requirement: Section 90.219b1iThis rule requires that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
non-licensees seeking to operate part 90
signal boosters must obtain the express consent of the licensees of the frequencies for which the device or system is intended to amplify. The rules further require that such consent must be maintained in a recordable format that can be presented to a FCC
representative or other relevant licensee investigating interference.
Cross-reference to Other Rule Parts:
Sections 22.9, 24.9, and 27.9
Operation of a consumer signal booster under Parts 22, 24, and 27 of the Commissions rules must also comply with section 20.21 of the Commissions rules, including all relevant information collections.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
FR Doc. 202102771 Filed 21021; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 671201P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Notice of the FDICs Response to Exception Requests Pursuant to Recordkeeping for Timely Deposit Insurance Determination Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC.
ACTION: Notice of the FDICs response to exception requests pursuant to the Recordkeeping for Timely Deposit Insurance Determination rule.
AGENCY:
In accordance with its rule regarding recordkeeping for timely deposit insurance determination, the FDIC is providing notice that it has granted time-limited exception relief to covered institutions from: The information technology system and recordkeeping requirements applicable to certain formal revocable and irrevocable trust accounts; the information technology system requirements, general recordkeeping requirements, and alternative recordkeeping requirements applicable to certain deposit accounts for which the covered institution must perform data clean up to assign an appropriate ownership right and capacity code to the subject accounts and related system updates; the information technology system requirements and general recordkeeping requirements to certain internal work-in-process deposit accounts for which the covered institutions information technology system is not yet capable of calculating deposit insurance within 24 hours after the appointment of the FDIC as receiver;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and the information technology system requirements, general recordkeeping requirements, and alternative recordkeeping requirements for a limited number of deposit accounts held in the covered institutions trust department, which acts in an agency or fiduciary capacity.
DATES: The FDICs grants of exception relief were effective as of February 3, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benjamin Schneider, Section Chief, Division of Complex Institution Supervision and Resolution;
beschneider@fdic.gov; 9173202534.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FDIC
granted two time-limited exception requests to multiple covered institutions and three time-limited exception requests to a covered institution pursuant to the FDICs rule entitled Recordkeeping for Timely Deposit Insurance Determination, codified at 12 CFR part 370 part 370.1 Part 370
generally requires covered institutions to implement the information technology system and recordkeeping capabilities needed to quickly calculate the amount of deposit insurance coverage available for each deposit account in the event of failure. Pursuant to 370.8b1, one or more covered institutions may submit a request in the form of a letter to the FDIC for an exception from one or more of the requirements of part 370 if circumstances exist that would make it impracticable or overly burdensome to meet those requirements. Pursuant to 370.8b3, a covered institution may rely upon another covered institutions exception request which the FDIC has previously granted by notifying the FDIC that it will invoke relief from certain part 370 requirements and demonstrating that the covered institution has substantially similar facts and circumstances to those of the covered institution that has already received the FDICs approval. The notification letter must also include the information required under 370.8b1
and cite the applicable notice published pursuant to 370.8b2. Unless informed otherwise by the FDIC within 120 days after the FDICs receipt of a complete notification for exception, the exception will be deemed granted subject to the same conditions set forth in the FDICs published notice.
These grants of relief will be subject to ongoing FDIC review, analysis, and verification during the FDICs routine part 370 compliance tests. The FDIC
presumes each covered institution is 1 12
E:FRFM11FEN1.SGM
CFR part 370.
11FEN1