Federal Register - January 29, 2021
Versione di testo Cosa è?Dateas è un sito indipendente non affiliato a entità governative. La fonte dei documenti PDF che pubblichiamo qui è l'entità governativa indicata in ciascuno di essi. Le versioni in testo sono trascrizioni che realizziamo per facilitare l'accesso e la ricerca di informazioni, ma possono contenere errori o non essere complete.
Source: Federal Register
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 18 / Friday, January 29, 2021 / Notices more than the 1Gb connection. Rather, it is the associated premium-product level network monitoring, reporting, and support services costs that accompany a 10Gb ULL connection which causes it to be 8 times more costly to provide than the 1Gb connection. Accordingly, the Exchange believes it is equitable to allocate those network infrastructure costs that accompany a 10Gb ULL connection to the purchasers of those connections, and not to purchasers of 1Gb connections.
As discussed above, the Exchange differentiates itself by offering a premium-product network experience, as an operator of a high performance, ultra-low latency network with unparalleled system throughput, which network can support access to three distinct options markets and multiple competing market-makers having affirmative obligations to continuously quote over 750,000
distinct trading products per exchange, and the capacity to handle approximately 38 million quote messages per second. The premiumproduct network experience enables users of 10Gb and 10Gb ULL
connections to receive the network monitoring and reporting services for those approximately 750,000 distinct trading products. There is a significant, quantifiable amount of research and development R&D effort, employee compensation and benefits expense, and other expense associated with providing the high touch network monitoring and reporting services that are utilized by the 10Gb and 10Gb ULL connections offered by the Exchange. These value add services are fully-discussed herein, and the actual costs associated with providing these services are the basis for the differentiated amount of the fees for the various connectivity alternatives.
In order to provide more detail and to quantify the Exchanges costs associated with providing access to the Exchange in general, the Exchange notes that there are material costs associated with providing the infrastructure and headcount to fully-support access to the Exchange. The Exchange incurs technology expense related to establishing and maintaining Information Security services, enhanced network monitoring and customer reporting, as well as Regulation SCI
mandated processes, associated with its network technology. While some of the expense is fixed, much of the expense is not fixed, and thus increases as the services associated with the Proposed Access Fees increase. For example, new 10Gb ULL connections require the purchase of additional hardware to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Jan 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
support those connections as well as enhanced monitoring and reporting of customer performance that MIAX and its affiliates provide. Further, as the total number of all connections increase, MIAX and its affiliates need to increase their data center footprint and consume more power, resulting in increased costs charged by their third-party data center provider. Accordingly, the cost to MIAX
and its affiliates is not fixed. The Exchange believes the Proposed Access Fees are reasonable in order to offset the costs to the Exchange associated with providing access to its network infrastructure.
Further, because the costs of operating its own data center are significant and not economically feasible for the Exchange at this time, the Exchange does not operate its own data centers, and instead contracts with a third-party data center provider. The Exchange notes that other competing exchange operators own/operate their data centers, which offers them greater control over their data center costs.
Because those exchanges own and operate their data centers as profit centers, the Exchange is subject to additional costs. The Proposed Access Fees, which are charged for accessing the Exchanges data center network infrastructure, are directly related to the network and offset such costs.
The Exchange invests significant resources in network R&D to improve the overall performance and stability of its network. For example, the Exchange has a number of network monitoring tools some of which were developed inhouse, and some of which are licensed from third-parties, that continually monitor, detect, and report network performance, many of which serve as significant value-adds to the Exchanges Members and enable the Exchange to provide a high level of customer service.
These tools detect and report performance issues, and thus enable the Exchange to proactively notify a Member and the SIPs when the Exchange detects a problem with a Members connectivity. In fact, the Exchange often receives inquiries from other industry participants regarding the status of networking issues outside of the Exchanges own network environment that are impacting the industry as a whole via the SIPs, including inquiries from regulators, because the Exchange has a superior, state-of the-art network that, through its enhanced monitoring and reporting solutions, often detects and identifies industry-wide networking issues ahead of the SIPs. The Exchange also incurs costs associated with the maintenance
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7605
and improvement of existing tools and the development of new tools.
Additionally, certain Exchangedeveloped network aggregation and monitoring tools provide the Exchange with the ability to measure network traffic with a much more granular level of variability. This is important as Exchange Members demand a higher level of network determinism and the ability to measure variability in terms of single digit nanoseconds. Also, routine R&D projects to improve the performance of the networks hardware infrastructure result in additional cost.
In sum, the costs associated with maintaining and enhancing a state-ofthe-art exchange network in the U.S.
options industry is a significant expense for the Exchange that also increases year-over-year, and thus the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to offset those costs through the Proposed Access Fees. The Exchange invests in and offers a superior network infrastructure as part of its overall options exchange services offering, resulting in significant costs associated with maintaining this network infrastructure, which are directly tied to the amount of the Proposed Access Fees that must be charged to access it, in order to recover those costs.
For the avoidance of doubt, none of the expenses included herein relating to the services associated with the Proposed Access Fees also relate to the provision of any other services offered by the Exchange. Stated differently, no expense amount of the Exchange is allocated twice. The Exchange notes that it made certain representations in a previous filing 12 regarding its expense allocation for the provision of additional limited service ports. The Exchange represents that none of the expenses allocated to the provision of additional limited service ports are also allocated to the services associated with the Proposed Access Feesthat is, there is no overlap of any such expenses that are included in the costs associated with services the Exchange provides for the Proposed Access Fees and for the services the Exchange provides for ports. Lastly, the Exchange notes that, with respect to the MIAX PEARL
expenses included herein, those expenses only cover the MIAX PEARL
options market; expenses associated with the MIAX PEARL equities market are accounted for separately and are not included within the scope of this filing.
The Exchange only has four primary sources of revenue: Transaction fees, access fees which includes the 12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90811
December 29, 2020 SRMIAX202041.
E:FRFM29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1