Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS

2318

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Proposed Rules
quotations on the Expert Market? Where possible, please provide data or identify sources of information the Commission could use to analyze the impact of the relief on liquidity and price discovery.
6. Does the proposed policies and procedures condition provide appropriate assurance that real-time and delayed quotations published or submitted on the Expert Market would not be accessible to the general public, including retail investors, other than the Qualified Experts? Please explain why or why not. If not, please explain how the condition should be modified, including the minimum requirements that should be included in OTC Links policies and procedures to 1 ensure that only Qualified Experts can view quotations published or submitted on the Expert Market and 2 address concerns about fraud and manipulation?
7. Does the proposed recordkeeping condition for OTC Link LLC provide appropriate means to facilitate the Commissions oversight of the Expert Market, including of Subscribers that publish or submit quotations on the Expert Market and the distribution of such quotations? Please explain why or why not. If not, please explain how the condition should be modified.
8. Are the proposed safeguards appropriate to ensure that only investors who are able to assess the risks and merits of investment in the categories of securities proposed to be included in the Expert Market are able to access quotations? Are the proposed conditions of this exemptive order in conjunction with FINRA rules that govern this market sufficient to prevent the general public from accessing quotations published or submitted in the Expert Market, or should the Commission impose additional conditions? Are there any other safeguards that should be implemented in the Expert Market to protect investors?
9. Are there additional conditions that the exemptive order providing the relief proposed herein should include to help prevent persons who are not Qualified Experts from accessing quotations published or submitted on the Expert Market? If yes, please specify such condition and explain how this suggestion would be necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors.
10. Should the exemptive order providing the relief proposed herein include a sunset provision so that the relief would expire on a particular date?
If yes, what would be an appropriate date on which the relief should expire e.g., one year after the issuance of the exemptive order, etc. and why? Please
VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:31 Jan 11, 2021

Jkt 253001

discuss the costs and benefits of including such a sunset provision in the exemptive order. Additionally, please explain why such a sunset provision would be necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors.
Alternatively, please explain why the exemptive order should omit a sunset provision, including a discussion of the benefits and costs of such omission or any distortive effects on the market.
Lastly, please discuss whether there are alternative means of achieving any benefits of a sunset provision.
By the Commission.
Dated: December 22, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman, Secretary.
FR Doc. 202028700 Filed 11121; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 801101P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
EPAR09OAR20190440; FRL10018
44Region 9

Clean Air Plans; 2008 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Requirements;
Western Nevada County, California Environmental Protection Agency EPA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:

The Environmental Protection Agency EPA is proposing to approve, or conditionally approve, all or portions of a state implementation plan SIP
revision submitted by the State of California to meet Clean Air Act CAA
or Act requirements for the 2008 8hour ozone national ambient air quality standards NAAQS or standards in the Nevada County Western part, California ozone nonattainment area Western Nevada County. The SIP
revision is the Ozone Attainment Plan, Western Nevada County, State Implementation Plan for the 2008
Primary Federal 8-Hour Ozone Standard of .075 ppm 2018 Western Nevada County Ozone Plan or Plan. The 2018 Western Nevada County Ozone Plan addresses the Serious nonattainment area requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, including the requirements for emissions inventories, attainment demonstration, reasonable further progress, reasonably available control measures, and contingency measures, among others; and establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets. The EPA is proposing to approve the 2018
Western Nevada County Ozone Plan as
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00020

Fmt 4702

Sfmt 4702

meeting all the applicable ozone nonattainment area requirements except for the contingency measures requirement, for which the EPA is proposing conditional approval. In addition, the EPA is beginning the adequacy process for the 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets in the 2018
Western Nevada County Ozone Plan through this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Written comments must arrive on or before February 11, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPAR09
OAR20190440 at https
www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information CBI
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions audio, video, etc. must be accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system. For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: T.
Khoi Nguyen, Air Planning Office AIR
2, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, 415 947
4120, or by email at nguyen.thien@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, we, us, and our refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents I. Regulatory Context A. Ozone Standards, Area Designations, and SIPs B. The Western Nevada County Ozone Nonattainment Area
E:FRFM12JAP1.SGM

12JAP1