Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

994

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 4 / Thursday, January 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 745.223

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not a significant energy action as defined in Executive Order 13211 66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001, because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution or use of energy and the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not otherwise determined that the action is a significant energy action.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act NTTAA

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
This action is subject to the CRA, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
8042.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 745
Environmental protection, Abatement, Child-occupied facility, Clearance levels, Hazardous substances, Lead, Lead poisoning, Lead-based paint, Target housing.
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator.

Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter R, is amended as follows:
PART 745AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 745
continues to read as follows:

jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2605, 2607, 2681
2692 and 42 U.S.C. 4852d.

2. Amend 745.223 by revising the definition for Clearance levels to read as follows:

Jkt 253001

e
8
viii The clearance levels for lead in dust are 10 mg/ft2 for floors, 100 mg/ft2
for interior window sills, and 400 mg/ft2
for window troughs.

BILLING CODE 656050P

L. Congressional Review Act CRA

16:55 Jan 06, 2021

745.227 Work practice standards for conducting lead-based paint activities:
Target housing and child-occupied facilities.

FR Doc. 202028565 Filed 1621; 8:45 am
EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
The documentation for this decision is contained in the Economic Analysis, which is available in the docket Ref. 7.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Clearance levels are values that indicate the amount of lead in dust on a surface following completion of an abatement activity. To achieve clearance when dust sampling is required, values below these levels must be achieved.

3. Amend 745.227 by revising paragraph e8viii to read as follows:

Since this action does not involve any technical standards, NTTAA section 12d, 15 U.S.C. 272 note, does not apply to this action.

Definitions.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
WC Docket Nos. 1142, 17108, 17287;
FCC 20151; FRS 17241

Restoring Internet Freedom; Bridging the Digital Divide for Low-Income Consumers; Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:

In this document, the Federal Communications Commission Commission responds to a remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit directing the Commission to assess the effects of the Commissions Restoring Internet Freedom Order on public safety, pole attachments, and the statutory basis for broadband internet access services inclusion in the universal service Lifeline program. This document also amends the Commissions rules to remove broadband internet service from the list of services supported by the universal service Lifeline program, while preserving the Commissions authority to fund broadband internet access service through the Lifeline program.
DATES: This Order on Remand shall become effective February 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00062

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

Annick Banoun, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at 202 4181521, annick.banoun@
fcc.gov.
This is a summary of the Commissions Order on Remand in WC Docket Nos. 1142, 17
108, and 17287, adopted October 27, 2020, and released on October 29, 2020.
The document is available for download at https www.fcc.gov/document/fccresponds-narrow-remand-restoringinternet-freedom-order-0. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format, send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 2024180530 voice, 202
4180432 TTY.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Synopsis 1. In the Restoring Internet Freedom Order 83 FR 7852, Feb. 22, 2018, we reversed the Commissions misguided and short-lived utility-style regulation of the internet and returned to the lighttouch regulatory framework for broadband internet access service that facilitated rapid and unprecedented growth for almost two decades. In this Order on Remand, we maintain this well-established approach after further considering three discrete issues raised by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit D.C.
Circuit.
2. In Mozilla Corp. v. FCC, the D.C.
Circuit upheld the vast majority of our decision in the Restoring Internet Freedom Order, remanding three discrete issues for further considerationnamely, the effect of that Order on: 1 Public safety; 2 the regulation of pole attachments; and 3
universal service support for lowincome consumers through the Lifeline program. Because the court concluded that the Commission may well be able to address on remand these three issues, it declined to vacate the Restoring Internet Freedom Order, pending our further analysis. After considering the three issues identified by the court in light of the record developed thereafter, we see no grounds to depart from our determinations in the Restoring Internet Freedom Order.
I. Background 3. Building on decades of precedent, the Commission adopted the Restoring Internet Freedom Order to return to the successful light-touch bipartisan framework that promoted a free and open internet and, for almost twenty years, saw it flourish. The Restoring
E:FRFM07JAR1.SGM

07JAR1