Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

FEDERAL

RERIST
1934

VOLUME 20

ONnto

NUMBER 235

Washington, Saturday, December 3, 1955

all of whom notified the Department CONTENTS
th at they will be able to market the Agricultural Marketing Service Page additional quantities of sugar.
The Chapter VIII Commodity Stabiliza Proposed rule making:
proration has been made on the basis of tion Service Sugar, Department of the allotments of such allottees as set Egg products; grading and inAgriculture 8932
spection_____________
forth in paragraph a of 814.31, Shell eggs; grading inspection;
Amendment 1. The names of the allot Subchapter BSugar Requirements and Quotas U. S. standards, grades and tees receiving additional prorations and Sugar Reg. 814.31, Amdt. 2
weight classes_____________ 8933
the quantities prorated are set forth Rules and regulations:
below;
Part 814Allotment of S ugar Q uotas Lemons grown in California and Arizona; limitations of ship DOMESTIC BEET SUGAR AREA, 1955
Additioial allotments____________________ 8873
nts me Basis and purpose. This amendment Navel oranges grown in Arizona Processors is issued under section 205 a of the and designated part of Cali 100-pound Short Sugar Act of 1948, as amended 7 U. S. C.
fornia; limitation of han tons, raw bags beet sugar value 1100 et seq., hereinafter called the act dling_________
8871
for the purpose of revising Sugar Regu Oranges, grapefruit, and tan
lation 814.31 19 F. R. 9326, 20 F. R. Amalgamated Sugar Co., The---7,569
404
gerines grown in Florida;
8,416
450
Crystal Sugar Co------3999 which allots the 1955 sugar quota American limitations of shipments 3
331
18
Sugars, Inc--------------for the Domestic Beet Sugar Area among Buckeye 331
18
Franklin "County Sugar Co-------documents___________ 8871,8872
244
13
Garden City Co., The________
persons who process domestic sugar beets 697 Agriculture Department 37
Great Lakes Sugar Co------------into sugar.
8,974 See also Agricultural Marketing 480
Holly Sugar Corp_______ ____
296
N16
In accordance with the provisions of Lake Shore Sugar Co-------------14
255
Service; Commodity Stabiliza Sugar Co-----------------the applicable rules of practice and pro Layton 174
9 Menominee Sugar Co_________
tion Service.
1,917
103
cedure 7 CFR 801.1 et seq. as amended Michigan Sugar Co_.-------------Notices:
Sugar Division of Robt.
20 F. R. 1174 notice was given 20 Monitor 645
35.
Gage Coal Co____________
Departmental agencies; trans F. R. 2820 and a hearing was held on Spreckels 6,578
352
Sugar Co
fer of functions-_______
8936
Sugar Division, ConsoliMay 6,1955, to permit the taking of evi Union 2,596
139
Foods Corp__________
Commerce Department dence on the basis of which the Secretary Udated 5,977
320
tah-Idaho Sugar Co------- -----Notices:
might revise the allotment of the 1955
45,000
2,408
Total------------------------Reports of appointments and sugar quota for the Domestic Beet Sugar statements of financial inArea for the purpose of allotting defi fp rp c tc
cits in other area quotas or deficits in Because of the limited time remaining Abbott, Edward----------------- 8937
allotments declared by any allottee. in the quota year to which the allot Bailey, Frank R----------------- 8937
Based on the evidence in the record of ments apply, it is imperative th a t this Clark, Robert W__________ 8937
the allotment proceeding, a finding and amendment become effective at the earli Cross, John L _____ 8937
conclusion was made in S. R. 814.31, est possible date in order to permit the Denney, Courtlandt F--------- 8938
Amendment 1, effective June 9, 1955 20 continued orderly marketing of sugar.
Edmunds, Jr., William J ------ 8938
F. R. 3999 th at any Quantities within Accordingly, it is hereby found that com Floyd, Paul E____________ 8938
allotments made therein which allottees pliance with the 30-day effective date Halderman, Lawrence J ____ 8938
were unable to fill should be reallotted to requirements of the Administrative Pro Hodgins, Theodore S------------ 8938
others able to supply the additional sugar cedure Act 60 Stat. 237 is impracticable Hunter, Jr., John A________ 8939
in proportion to their allotments.
and contrary to the public interest and Ireland, George----------------- 8939
The Department was notified by The consequently this amendment shall be James, Robert D_____________8940
National Sugar Manufacturing Company effective when published in the F ederal Jones, William J ________
8939
and the Superior Sugar Refining Com R egister.
LaGrelius, Elmer L_________ 8939
pany that they will be unable to market Pursuant to the authority vested in Lea, L. G________________ 8940
in 1955, 1,338 and 1,070 short tons, raw the Secretary of Agriculture by section Lickey, Edward F__________ 8940
value, respectively, of the allotments 205 a of the Act, paragraph a of Pommer, Clifford G------------ 8940
made to them in Sugar Regulation 814.31, Amendment 1, is hereby further Postweiler, Norval W---------- 8941
814.31, Amendment 1, effective June 9, amended to read as follows:
Schlueter, Louis A --------- 8941
1955, and The Great Western Sugar 814.31 Allotment of the 1955 ugar Sebastian, Robert L------------ 8941
Company notified the Department that quota for Domestic Beet Sugar Area-rSeeley, Clarence W_______
8941
it would be unable to market in 1955 a a Allotments.
1955 sugar quota Stuart, Charles M--------- -. 8941
quantity o f . sugar in excess of its for the DomesticThe Beet Sugar Area is Thomas, William H------------- 8942
1955 allotment. The quantity released, hereby allotted to the following persons Vuckel, Carl M______ - - 8942
amounting to 2,408 short tons, raw value, Ware, Joel B____ __________ 8942
Continued on p. 8871
has been prorated to the other allottees, 8869

TITLE 7 AGRICULTURE