Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

Tuesday, February 26, 1952

1683

FEDERAL REGISTER

P rorate B a se S c h e d u l e Continued ment after an open meeting of the Lemon Administrative Committee on February District No. 2Continued 20, 1952, such meeting was held, after Prorate base giving due notice thereof to consider Handler percent recommendations for regulation, and Eadington Fruit Co_____________- 0.339
interested persons were afforded an op JIazeltine Packing Co------------------ - 1.199
portunity to submit their views at this Ventura Coastal Lemon Co_______ _ 2.309
meeting; the provisions of this section, Ventura Pacific Co---------------------- 1.418
including its effective time, are identical Glendora Lemon Growers Associa _____________r------------------- 2. 854
with the aforesaid recommendation of Lation Verne Lemon Association_____ _
1. 052
the committee, and information con La Habra Citrus Association--------.928
cerning such provisions and effective Yorba Linda Citrus Association, time has been disseminated among han- .
T h e_______ _____ -
. 584
. 091
dlers of such lemons; it is necessary, in El Cajon Valley Citrus Association..
order to effectuate the declared policy of Escondido Lemon Association.. _ 4.116
the act, to make this section effective Alta Loma Heights Citrus Associa 1.255
tio n ___________
during the period hereinafter specified;
Citrus Fruit Association . 807
and compliance with this section will not Etiwanda Mountain View Fruit Association_
. 356
require any special preparation on the Old Baldy Citrus Association_____ _ 1. 511
part of persons subject thereto which San Dimas Lemon Association-----1. 666
cannot be completed by the effective Upland Lemon Growers Association. 7. 405
Central Lemon Association-----------. 842
time thereof.
b Order. 1 The quantity of lem Irvine Citrus Association, T h e .. - 1. 024
ons grown in the State of California or Placentia Mutual Orange Associa tion _________________________ 2.119
in the State of Arizona which may be Corona Citrus Association_________
. 659
handled during the period beginning at Corona Foothill Lemon Co________ 3. 792
12:01 a. m., P. s. t., February 24, 1952, Jameson Co_________________
1. 301
and ending at 12:01 a. m., P. s. t., March Arlington Heights Citrus Co--------1. 802
College Heights Orange & Lemon 2, 1952, is hereby fixed as follows:
Association_____________
3. 770
1 District 1: 10 carloads;
Chula Vista Citrus Association, T he.
. 877
ii District 2: 290 carloads;
iii District 3: Unlimited movement. Escondido Co-operative Citrus As sociation _____________________.360
2 The prorate base of each handler Fallbrook Citrus Association_____ _ 2. 549
who has made application therefor, as Lemon Grove Citrus Association__
. 450
provided in the said amended market Carpintería Lemon Association____
2. 328
ing agreement and order, is hereby fixed Carpintería Mutual Citrus Associa tio n ____________________
in accordance with the prorate base 3. 403
schedule which is attached hereto and Goleta Lemon Association_______
Johnston Fruit Co________________ 3. 682
made a part hereof by this reference.
North Whittier Heights Citrus As 3 As used in this section, handled, sociation______________________
.966
handler, carloads, prorate base, San Fernando Heights Lemon Asso District 1 District 2 and District 3. 768
ciation_________.-_____________
3, shall have the same meaning as when Sierra Madre-Lamanda Citrus Asso ciation_______________________
1. 412
used in the said amended marketing Briggs Lemon Association________
. 730
agreement and order.

ec. 5, 49 Stat. 753, as amended; 7 U. S. C.
and Sup. 608c j
Done at Washington, D. C. this 21st day of February 1952.
seal

S. R . S m it h ,
Director, Fruit and Vegetable Branch, Production and Mar keting Administration.
P rorate B ase S c h e d u l e
District No. 1
Storage date: Feb. 17, 1952
12:01 a. m. Feb. 24, 1952, to 12:01 a. m:
Mar. 9, 1952
Prorate base Handler -percent Total_________ !___________ 100.000
Klink Citrus Association.:________
31.726
Lemon Cove Association________ _ 2. I l l Porterville Citrus Association_____
1.070
Tulare Co. Lemon & Grapefruit Association__._______ .----------- - . 58.953
California Citrus Groves, Inc., Ltd..
1. 213
Harding & Leggett.---------------------4. 927
Zaninovich Brof, Inc_____________
. 000
District No. 2
Total_____________________ 100.000
American__ Fruit Growers, Inc.,_Co rona ;
.615
American Fruit Growers, Inc., Fullerton_______________ 1______
.794
American Fruit Growers, Inc.,Up land--- ----.564

Culbertson Lemon Association____
Fillmore Lemon Association______
Oxnard Citrus Association________
Rancho Sespe___________________
Santa Clara Lemon Association. ___
Santa Paula Citrus Fruit Associa tion__________________________
Saticoy Lemon Association________
Seaboard Lemon Association______
Somis Lemon Association________
Ventura Citrus Association______
Ventura County Citrus Association.
Limoneira Co____________
Teague-McKevett Association____ _
East Whittier Citrus Association__
Leffingwell Rancho Lemon Associa tion______
Murphy Ranch Co_________ ___ Chula Vista Mutual-Lemon Associa tion__________________________
Index Mutual Association_______
La Verne Cooperative Citrus Asso ciation ______ ________________
Orange Belt Fruit Distributors----Ventura County Orange, & Lemon Association___________________
Whittier Mutual Orange & Lemon Association____________________ Evans Brothers Packing Co________ Ruarte, Joseph D-----------------------Latimer, Harold__________________ Paramount Citrus Association, In c.
Torn Ranch_____________________ Orange Hill Groves__ ________

. 904
1. 226
3. 643
. 408
2. 296

2.078
2.185
2. 634
2. 497
.632
. 607
1. 404
. 509
.577
. 544
.722
. 657
. 534
3. 735
1. 049
2. 289
.061
.000
.084
. 058
.412
. 000
.008

F. R. Doc. 52-2247; Filed, Feb. 25, 1952;
10:04 a. m.

TITLE 32A NATIONAL DEFENSE, APPENDIX
Chapter III Office of Price Stabiliza tion, Economic Stabilization Agency Ceiling Price Regulation U3, Revision 1, Amendment 3

CPR 113W h it e F l e sh P otatoes CHANGES IN BASE PRICES AND MISCELLANEOUS
CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS

Pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended Pub. Law 774, 81st Cong., Pub. Law 96, 82d Cong., Executive Order 10161, and Economic Stabilization Agency General Order No.
2, this Amendment 3 to Ceiling Price Regulation 113, Revision 1, is hereby issued.
STATEMENT OF CONSIDERATIONS

This Amendment to Revision 1, Ceiling Price Regulation 113 provides disaster adjustments for certain Western states, imposes ceiling prices for sales by grow ers, and makes other miscellaneous changes and clarifications.
As stated in a recent Office of Price Stabilization Agency announcement, ad justments to compensate for abnormally low quantity and quality yields of pota toes in certain Western states have been under active consideration. In addition to the data otherwise available to OPS, data have been received from the areas 2.550
affected and the United States Depart ment of Agriculture. However, in each case these adjustments have been deter mined by OPS on the basis of quantity and quality yield information by states supplied by the Department of Agricul ture. OPS used the quantity and qual ity yield estimates furnished by the De partment of Agriculture because it is be lieved that generally the facilities and experience of the Department make their estimates most reliable. However, OPS applied its own standards for disas ter adjustment and made the determi nation of the area -and the amount of each adjustment. A further adjugé ment of 20 cents per hundredweight iSjfi been granted for Idaho. This has befn made necessary on the basis of revised information furnished by the Depart ment of Agriculture of the grade yield figures for that state. Base prices for potatoes produced in Montana, where data reveal the same situation as in - Idaho, have been revised -and are now the same as for Idaho potatoes up to June 1952. One other area demon strated the need for a disaster adjust ment although the magnitude of the crop disaster was less than in Idaho and Montana. Accordingly, base prices for potatoes produced in Colorado, Ne braska, and Wyoming have been in creased 20 cents per hundredweight. In computing all these adjustments, con sideration was given to both quantity and quality yields and the adjustments are similar in nature to the crop disas ter adjustments made in the case of cer tain fruits in CPR 56.
It has come to the attention of OPS
that, in jnany areas, growers are being paid prices for bulk potatoes which prices are close to or at f. o, b. country