Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

FEDERAL
YOLUME 7

>

J?

-

1934
P arted
%

NUMBER 177

Washington, Wednesday, September 9, 1942
Regulations
hand and the seal of the Department of Agriculture.
seal

TITLE 7AGRICULTURE
Chapter IAgricultural Marketing Administration Subchapter ACommodity Standards and Standard Container Regulations
P art 26G rain S tandards AMENDMENT FIXING FEES AND CHARGES IN
AN APPEAL OR A DISPUTE

P aul H . A ppleby ,
Acting Secretary of Agriculture.
F. R.-Doc.

42-8869; Filed, September 8, 1942;
11:42 a. m.

Subchapter CRegulation Under the Farm Products Inspection Act
P art 51F ruits , Vegetables and O ther P roducts I nspection and C ertifica
tio n

By virtue of the authority vested in AMENDMENT CHANGING BASIS FOR CHARGES
the Secretary of Agriculture by the By virtue of authority vested in the United States Grain Standards Act 39 Secretary of Agriculture by law 50 Stat.
Stat. 482, as amended: 7 U.S.C. 1940 ed. 730, sec. 12, 7 U.S.C., 499n, the following 71-87, the following amendment to Title amendment, to become effective 30 days 7, Chapter I, Part 26, Code of Federal after the date of approval, to Title 7, Regulations 7 CFR and 1939 Supp., Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 51, Code Chapter I, Part 26, as amended and sup of Federal Regulations, as published in plemented by 5 F.R. 2883 and 6 F.R. the F ederal R egister on December 31, 417, 2675, is promulgated effective Oc 1941 6 F.R. 6817 is promulgated:
tober 1, 1942.
Section 51.36 is amended to read:
Section 26.74 is amended to read:
51.36 Basis for charges. The fee 26.74 Fees and charges. The fee for each lot of products inspected by a in an appeal or a dispute shall be fixed salaried inspector acting exclusively for as follows:
the Department of Agriculture, except a For bulk or sacked grain in car for peanuts, pecans, and other nuts, and load lots, $2.00 per car;
except under the provisions of 51.19, b For bulk or sacked grain in a shall-be on the following basis: For an wagon or truck or in a lot of 75 sacks inspection covering quality and/or con or less, $1.00 per wagon, truck, or lot;
dition, $4 when the quantity involved is c For a submitted sample or pack more than Vz a carload of the customary age of grain, $1.00 per sample or size for such products in the area from package;
which shipped but not more than a full d For all lots of grain other thancarload, and $2.50 when the quantity in those referred to in a, b, and c of volved is not more than % of such a car this section, $1.00 per one thousand load, but the maximum fee for any car bushels or fraction thereof, with a min load not exceeding the customary size imum fee of $2.00.
shall be $7.50. For each lot. of peanuts, Charges may be made for telegrams, pecans, or other nuts inspected, except express, parcel post, registry fees, travel under 51.19 the fee shall be $5 when expenses, and other items paid or in the quantity involved is-not more than curred by the Department on account of a full carload, provided that different an appeal or a dispute and for oral hear grades and varieties of peanuts shall be ings, as will reimburse the Department;
considered separate lots. When the lot all such additional items to be deter involved is in excess of a carload the mined by the Administrator. Unless quantity shall be calculated in terms of otherwise stated in the findings in any carloads and fractions thereof of the cus appeal, the fee as prescribed by this reg tomary size for such carloads and the ulation and no further charges, shall be carload rates aforesaid applied provided deemed to be fixed and assessed.
that said fractions shall be calculated Done at Washington, D. C., this 7th in terms of fourths or next higher day of September 1942. Witness my Continued on next page
CONTENTS
REGULATIONS AND NOTICES
A gricultural M arketing Adm inis
tration

Detroit, Mich., sales area; ter mination of milk license.__
Fruits, vegetables, etc.; inspec tion charges____________
Grain standards; fees in appeals or disputes_____________

Page 7111
7067
7067

B itum inous C oal D iv isio n :

Burk, Francis E., & Sons and v Howard Williams; restora tion of code membership__
Cease and desist orders:
Burns Mine__ ___________
Rowell and Rowell. ________
Webb, John_______________
Code membership revocations, etc.:
Bratcher, Claude B_______
Gibbs Bros__________
Weiderkehr, Francis_______
District 23, relief denied certain mines_________________
Hearings, etc.:
Coal Hill Mining Co., Inc___
District Board 3__
District Board 8 2 docu ments___ ___________
District Board 19____
Market Street Coal Co_____
Redding, Thos____________
Okes, C. V., complaint dis missed________________
Reports and records; methods of filing analyses, etc_______
Woodrow, Walter, determina tion of exemption_______

7109
7110
7110
7107
7106
7106
7107
7108
7103
7105
7108
7109
7110
7110
7107
7076
7108

C ivil S ervice C o m m ission :

Condition of apportionment at close of business August 31.
1942___________________ 7111
F ederal P ower C om m ission :

United Gas Pipe Line Co.; hear ing-------------F ederal
P ublic H ousing th ority :

7111

Au

Chapman, Henry G., authority delegation______________ 7112
War housing, delegation of con tracting powers_________ 7112
F ederal S avings and L oan S y stem :

Purchase of assets__________ 7075
Continued on next page 7067