Voglio sapere a riguardo di…

FEDERAL REGISTER, Friday, January 31, 1941
order, White King Soap Company, Docket 3928, January 10, 1941
At a regular session of the Federal Trade Commission, held at its office ih the City of Washington, D. C., on the 10th day of January, A. D. 1941.
This proceeding having been heard1 by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission, the answer of the respondent, testimony and other evidence taken before examiners of the Commission theretofore duly designated by it, in support of the allegations of said complaint and in opposition thereto, brief filed by counsel for the Commission no brief having been filed on behalf of the respondent and oral agreement not having been requested, and the Com mission having made its findings as to the facts and its conclusion that said re spondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act;
It is ordered, That respondent, White King Soap Company, a corporation, its officers, representatives, agents and em ployees, directly or through any corpo rate or other device, in connection with the offering for sale, sale and distribu tion of its soaps designated White King Granulated Soap and White King Toi let Soap, or any other soaps composed of substantially similar ingredients or possessing substantially similar proper ties, whether sold under the same names or under any other names, in commerce, as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, d o . forthwith cease and desist from:
1 Representing that said soap des ignated White King Granulated Soap is the only soap with which fabrics may satisfactorily be washed in cool water;
that the washing of all types of fabrics in cool water causes such fabrics to be brighter or whiter than when washed in hot water; that the use of said soap renders the use of bleaching and bluing unnecessary; that the use of a jelly made from said soap will remove all spots or stains from fabrics; that said soap is superior in quality or effectiveness to other soaps of the same general charac ter on the market; that all fabrics fade or shrink when washed in hot water;
that the use of said soap prevents fab rics from fading or shrinking;
2 Representing that said soap desig nated White King Toilet Soap will keep the skin fresh or supple, or prevent or remove wrinkles in the skin.
It is further ordered, That the re spondent shall, within sixty 60 days after service upon it of this order, file with the Commission a report in writing setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this order.
By the Commission.
seal
F. R.

O t is
B. J o h n so n , Secretary.

Doc. 41-709; Filed, January 30, 1941;
11:10 a. m.J

4 F R . 4750.

D ocket No. 4112

P art 3 D igest o f C ease and D esist O rders IN THE MATTER OF AMERICAN CORD &
WEBBING COMPANY

3.6 m 10 Advertising falsely or misleadinglyManufacture or prepara tion: 3.6 t Advertising falsely or m is leadinglyQualities or properties of product: 3.6 x Advertising falsely or misleadinglyResults. Representing, in connection with offer, etc., in commerce, of tape or web for Venetian Blinds, that respondents products are dyed with vat dyes when they are not in fact so dyed, and that the colors of respondents prod ucts will not change color or will not fade, or are impervious to the effects of sun light, or representing that the colors of such products will successfully resist the effects of sunlight for specified periods of time when such products do in fact fade or change color by reason of such exposure, prohibited. Sec. 5, 38 Stat.
719, as amended by sec. 3, 52 Stat. 112;
15 U.S.C., Supp. IV, sec. 45b Cease and desist order, American Cord &
Webbing Company, Docket 4112, Janu ary 10, 1941
3.6 c Advertising falsely or mis leadinglyComposition of goods: 3.96
a 1
Using misleading n a m e
GoodsComposition. Using, in connec tion with offer, etc., in commerce, of tape or web for Venetian Blinds, the term Lintex to any way describe or refer to a product which is not composed of linen, or otherwise representing that products which are not composed of linen are linen or contain linen, and the term Siltex to any way describe or refer to a product which is not composed of silk, or otherwise representing that prod ucts which are not composed of silk are silk or contain silk, prohibited. Sec.
5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended by sec. 3, 52 Stat. 112; 15 U.S.C., Supp. IV, sec.
45b Cease and desist order, Ameri can Cord & Webbing Company, Docket 4112, January 10, 1941
3.6 c Advertising falsely or m is leadinglyComposition of goods: 3.69
b 1 Misrepresenting oneself and goodsGoodsComposition: 3.71 a neglecting, unfairly or deceptively, to make material disclosureComposition.
In connection with offer, etc., in com merce, of tape or web for Venetian Blinds, 1 advertising, offering for sale or selling products composed in whole or in part of rayon, without clearly dis closing the fact that such products are composed of rayon, or 2 representing that respondents products are composed of fibers or materials other than those of which such products are actually com posed, prohibited; subject to the provi sion, however, in case of said first pro hibition, that when they are composed in part of rayon and in part of other fibers or materials, all such fibers or ma terials, including the rayon, shall be named in the order of their predomi nance by weight, beginning with the
685

largest single constituent. Sec. 5, 38
Stat. 719, as amended by sec. 3, 52 Stat.
112; 15 U.S.C., Supp. IV, sec. 45b Cease and desist order, American Cord &
Webbing Company, Docket 4112, Janu ary 10, 1941
In the M atter of Max Krauss, an Individ ual, trading as American Cord &
Webbing Company At a regular session of the Federal Trade Commission, held at its office in the City of Washington, D. C., on the 10th day of January, A. D. 1941.
This proceeding having been heard by the Federal Trade Commission upon the complaint of the Commission and the answer of the respondent, and the stipu lation as to the facts entered into be tween Nathan & Nathan, counsel for the respondent herein, and W. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel for the Commission, which provides, among other things, that with out further evidence,or other intervening procedure, the Commission may issue and serve upon the respondent herein findings as to the facts and conclusion based thereon, and an order disposing of the proceeding, and the Commission having made its findings as to the facts and conclusion that said respondent has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act;
I t is ordered, That the respondent, Max Krauss, an individual, trading as Amer ican Cord & Webbing Company, his rep resentatives, agents and employees, directly or through any corporate or other device, in connection with the of fering for sale, sale and distribution in commerce as commerce is defined in the Federal Trade Commission Act, of tape or web for Venetian Blinds, do forthwith cease and desist from:
1. Representing that respondents products are dyed with vat dyes when they afe not in fact so dyed;
2. Representing that the colors of re spondents products will not change color or will not fade, or are impervious to the effects of sunlight, or representing that the colors of such products will successfully resist the effects of sunlight for specified periods of time when such products do in fact fade or change color by reason of such exposure;
3. Using the term Lintex to any way describe or refer to a product which is not composed of linen, or otherwise rep resenting that products which are not composed of linen are linen or contain linen;
4. Using the term Siltex to any way describe or refer to a product which is not composed of silk, or otherwise repre senting that products which are not com posed of silk are silk or contain silk;
5. Advertising, offering for sale or sell in g products composed in whole .or in part of rayon, without clearly disclosing the fact that such products are composed of rayon, and when they are composed in part of rayon and in part of other fibers or materials, all such fibers or materials, including the rayon, shall be named in