Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 231 / Monday, December 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations and equity. Executive Order 13563
emphasized the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. The requirements in Executive Orders 12866 and 13573
for the analysis of costs and benefits apply to rules that are determined to be significant. It has been determined that this action is not significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866;
therefore, this rule was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has designated this rule as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 8042.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This rule does not preempt State or local laws, regulations, or policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. This rule will not be retroactive.

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES

Executive Order 12372
Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, requires consultation with officials of State and local governments that would be directly affected by the proposed Federal financial assistance.
The objectives of the Executive order are to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism by relying on State and local processes for the State and local government coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development. This rule will not directly affect State or local officials and, for this reason, it is excluded from the scope of Executive Order 12372.
Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601612, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule that is subject to notice and comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act APA or any other law, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to this rule because CCC
is not required by the APA or any other law to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking with respect to the subject
VerDate Sep<11>2014

15:44 Dec 03, 2021

Jkt 256001

matter of the rule. Therefore, this action is not a rule as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act and, thus, is exempt from the provisions of that Act.
Executive Order 13132
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 13132, Federalism.
This rule will not have any substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, except as required by law. This rule does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments. Therefore, consultation with the States was not required.
Executive Order 13175

Unfunded Mandates Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 UMRA, Pub. L.
1044 requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector.
Agencies generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with Federal mandates that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more in any 1 year for State, local, or Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector. UMRA generally requires agencies to consider alternative methods and adopt the more cost effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
This rule contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 for State, local, or Tribal governments, or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
Frm 00009

Fmt 4700

Sfmt 4700

requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act This final rule contains no new reporting, recordkeeping, or third-party disclosure requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq..
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1485
Agricultural commodities, Exports.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, CCC amends part 1485 of title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 1485GRANT AGREEMENTS
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
FOREIGN MARKETS FOR U.S.
AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1485 continues to read as follows:

This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments. Executive Order 13175
requires Federal agencies to consult and coordinate with tribes on a governmentto-government basis on policies that have tribal implications, including regulations, legislative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
CCC does not expect this rule to have any effect on Indian tribes.

PO 00000

68883

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 5623, 56625663.

2. In 1485.15, revise paragraph c6
to read as follows:

1485.15 Operational procedures for brand programs.

c
6 Require: That all product labels, promotional material, and advertising will identify the origin of the eligible commodity as American, Product of the United States of America, Product of the U.S., Product of the U.S.A., Product of America, Grown in the United States of America, Grown in the U.S., Grown in the U.S.A., Grown in America, Made in the United States of America, Made in the U.S., Made in the U.S.A., Made in America, or product of, grown in, or made in any state or territory of the United States of America spelled out in its entirety, or other U.S. regional designation if approved in advance by CCC; that such origin identification will be conspicuously displayed in a manner easily observed as identifying the origin of the product; and that such origin identification will conform, to the extent possible, to the U.S. standard of 16 inch .42 centimeters in height based on the lower case letter o. The use of these terms as a descriptor or in the name of the product e.g., Texas style chili, Bobs American Pizza does not satisfy the product origin requirement.
Phrases product of, grown in, or made in are encouraged, but not required. A MAP Participant that wishes to use an origin statement that varies from those set out in this subsection must submit the proposed statement to CCC for review and must receive approval to use the statement before its
E:FRFM06DER1.SGM

06DER1