Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 229 / Thursday, December 2, 2021 / Notices not know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate companyies involved in the transaction.7
The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired i.e., within 90 days of publication.

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results, as provided by section 751a2C of the Act: 1 The cash deposit rate for the companies under review will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin listed above in the Final Results of Review section; 2 for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previously completed segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the final results for the most recent period in which that producer or exporter participated; 3 if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be that established for the producer of the merchandise in these final results of review or in the final results for the most recent period in which that producer participated; and 4 if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in this review or in any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be 6.58 percent ad valorem, the all-others rate established 7 For
a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
May 6, 2003.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:49 Dec 01, 2021

Jkt 256001

in the less than fair value investigation.8
These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402f2 to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerces presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305a3, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751a1 and 777i1 of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213h.
Dated: November 23, 2021.
Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy &
Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1. Particular Market Situation Allegation Comment 2. Whether it was Proper to Accept Proprietary Grades Comment 3. Whether it was Proper not to Select Resolute as a Respondent 8 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR
51806 November 8, 2017.

PO 00000

Frm 00014

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

68473

Comment 4. Whether it was Proper not to Select Respondents based on Sampling Comment 5. Whether it was Proper not to have Adjusted U.S. Price by Countervailing Duties Comment 6. Zeroing Comment 7. Differential Pricing Comment 8. The Cohens d and Ratio Test Comment 9. Whether Commerces Simple Average of Variances is Appropriate Comment 10. Whether to Update J.D.
Irvings Cash Deposit Rate Comment 11. Whether Commerce Used the Proper Market Price for Canfors Wood Chip Sales Comment 12. Whether It Is Proper to Value Steam Based on the Market Price for Electricity, and Whether the Market Price of Electricity Should be Based Solely on Electricity Prices in Alberta Comment 13. Whether Canfors Prince George Sawmills Purchases of Electricity Should be Adjusted Comment 14. Whether Canfors Restructuring Costs Should be Excluded from Mill Costs Comment 15. Whether Commerce Should Adjust Canfors Reported Net Interest Expense Comment 16. Whether Commerce Committed a Ministerial Error in the Calculation of Canfors Margin Comment 17. Whether Commerce Should Include the Total Amount of Restructuring and Impairment Charges in West Frasers General and Administrative Expense Ratio Comment 18. Whether Commerce Made Certain Ministerial Errors With Respect to West Frasers Byproduct Offset Comment 19. Whether Commerce Made Certain Methodological Errors With Respect to West Frasers Byproduct Offset Comment 20. Whether Commerce Should Make an Adjustment to West Frasers Seed Purchases Comment 21. Whether Commerce Should Use West Frasers Alternative Grade Group Information V. Recommendation
Appendix II
Non-Selected Exporters/Producers 1. 0729670 B.C. Ltd. DBA Anderson Sales 2. 1074712 BC Ltd.
3. 258258 B.C. Ltd., dba Pacific Coast Cedar Products 4. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.
5. 752615 B.C Ltd 6. 92245737 Quebec Inc. aka A.G. Bois 7. A.B. Cedar Shingle Inc.
8. Absolute Lumber Products Ltd.
9. AJ Forest Products Ltd.
10. Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd.
11. Aler Forest Products Ltd.
12. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
13. American Pacific Wood Products 14. Anbrook Industries Ltd.
15. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
16. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.;
Anglo-American Cedar Products Ltd.
17. Antrim Cedar Corporation 18. Aquila Cedar Products Ltd.
19. Arbec Lumber Inc.
20. Aspen Planers Ltd.

E:FRFM02DEN1.SGM

02DEN1