Federal Register - December 2, 2021
Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.
Fuente: Federal Register
68412
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 229 / Thursday, December 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
a SIP to provide for attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. EPAs role, with respect to a SIP revision, is focused on reviewing the submission to determine whether it meets the minimum criteria of the CAA. Where it does, EPA must approve the submission. When approving a SIP
revision, the Agency is not establishing its own requirements for the state to implement. If, at any time, EPA finds that a SIP is inadequate to attain or maintain the relevant NAAQS or otherwise does not comply with the CAA, EPA has the authority under CAA
section 110k5 to require the state to revise its SIP to correct such inadequacies.
EPA agrees that air pollution is detrimental to human health and welfare and appreciates the Commenters support for this action.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
II. Incorporation by Reference In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of MCAPCO Rule 1.5214
Commencement of Operation, which has an effective date of December 15, 2015; and Rules 1.5212Applications;
1.5213Action on Application;
Issuance of Permit; 1.5215Application Processing Schedule; 1.5217
Confidential Information; 1.5218
Compliance Schedule for Previously Exempted Activities; 1.5219Retention of Permit at Permitted Facility; 1.5220
Applicability Determinations; 1.5221
Permitting of Numerous Similar Facilities; 1.5222Permitting of Facilities at Multiple Temporary Sites;
and 1.5232Issuance, Revocation, and Enforcement of Permits, all of which have an effective date of December 18, 2018, into the Mecklenburg County portion of the North Carolina SIP.
EPA has made and will continue to make these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information.
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPAs approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.6
6 See
62 FR 27968 May 22, 1997.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Dec 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
III. Final Action EPA is finalizing approval of changes to LIP-approved MCAPCO Rules 1.5212Applications; 1.5213Action on Application; Issuance of Permit;
1.5214Commencement of Operation;
1.5215Application Processing Schedule; 1.5219Retention of Permit at Permitted Facility; 1.5221
Permitting of Numerous Similar Facilities; 1.5222Permitting of Facilities at Multiple Temporary Sites;
and 1.5232Issuance, Revocation, and Enforcement of Permits. Additionally, EPA is proposing to approve MCAPCO
Rules 1.5217Confidential Information;
1.5218Compliance Schedule for Previously Exempted Activities; and 1.5220Applicability Determinations into the LIP. EPA is taking final action to approve these changes to the LIP
because they are consistent with the CAA.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410k; 40 CFR 52.02a.
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPAs role is to approve state choices, provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993 and 13563 76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.;
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Pub. L. 1044;
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999;
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997;
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001;
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12d of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 15 U.S.C. 272 note because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898
59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994.
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000, nor will it impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 8042.
Under section 307b1 of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 31, 2022. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. See section 307b2.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
E:FRFM02DER1.SGM
02DER1