Federal Register - October 1, 2021

Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.

Fuente: Federal Register

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Notices review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 7719B of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporters the request is intended to cover.
Note that, for any party Commerce was unable to locate in prior segments, Commerce will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the partys location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested partys attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303f3ii.
As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 May 6, 2003, and NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
October 24, 2011, Commerce clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.3
Commerce no longer considers the non-market economy NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative review.4 Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless Commerce specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of 3 See the Enforcement and Compliance website at https legacy.trade.gov/enforcement/.
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 November 4, 2013.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

18:04 Sep 30, 2021

Jkt 256001

the NME entity.5 In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, Commerce will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity.
However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entitys entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity. Following initiation of an antidumping duty administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate.
All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System ACCESS on Enforcement and Compliances ACCESS
website at https access.trade.gov.6
Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303fli, a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until further notice.7
Commerce will publish in the Federal Register a notice of Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation for requests received by the last day of October 2021. If Commerce does not receive, by the last day of October 2021, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of 5 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213b1, parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request.
6 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 July 6, 2011.
7 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID19, 85 FR 41363 July 10, 2020.

PO 00000

Frm 00013

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

54431

estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional measures gap period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community.
Dated: September 23, 2021.
James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
FR Doc. 202121406 Filed 93021; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 3510DSP

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Change in Deadline for Public Comments on U.S. Clean Technologies Export Competitiveness Strategy International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice and request for public comments; extension of comment period.
AGENCY:

On August 30, 2021, the International Trade Administration ITA published in the Federal Register a request for public comment on clean technologies export competitiveness to inform efforts to develop a U.S. Clean Technologies Export Competitiveness Strategy. ITA has determined that an extension of the comment period until October 15, 2021, is appropriate.
Comments previously submitted need not be resubmitted and will be fully considered.

SUMMARY:

The comment period for the notice published on August 30, 2021 86
FR 48399, regarding the request for public comments on clean technologies export competitiveness, is extended from October 1, 2021, to October 15, 2021.

DATES:

You may submit comments, identified by ITA20210005, by either of the following methods:
Online Submission Strongly Preferred: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https

ADDRESSES:

E:FRFM01OCN1.SGM

01OCN1

Acerca de esta edición

Federal Register - October 1, 2021

TítuloFederal Register

PaísEstados Unidos de América

Fecha01/10/2021

Nro. de páginas257

Nro. de ediciones7801

Primera edición14/03/1936

Ultima edición24/06/2026

Descargar esta edición

Otras ediciones

<<<Octubre 2021>>>
DLMMJVS
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31