Quiero saber acerca de...

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 172 / Thursday, September 9, 2021 / Notices 1 Actual
50527

quantity will be limited to remaining inventory.
and Critical Materials collected from E-Waste Strategic Materials collected from electronics waste.

2 Strategic
2021. For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4

FR Doc. 202119415 Filed 9821; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 351033P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration A201844

Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018
2019
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Commerce determines that steel concrete reinforcing bar rebar from Mexico was sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review POR, November 1, 2018, through October 31, 2019. In addition, Commerce determines that Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Ternium had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.
DATES: Applicable September 9, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202 4821671.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:

lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1

Background On March 23, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 On April 22, 2021, Commerce received case briefs on behalf of the petitioners 2 and Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. Deacero. On April 29, 2021, the petitioners and Deacero submitted rebuttal briefs.
Commerce extended the deadline for the final results by 58 days on June 22, 2021.3 The deadline for the final results of this review is now September 17,
1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 20182019, 86 FR
15458 March 23, 2021 Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 The petitioners are the Rebar Trade Action Coalition RTAC and its individual members, Nucor Corporation, Ameristeel US Inc., Commercial
VerDate Sep<11>2014

19:38 Sep 08, 2021

Jkt 253001

Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is steel concrete reinforcing bar from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Deacero; 2 used a revised U.S. sales database; 3 updated the date assigned to U.S. sales without a reported payment date; and 4 updated our calculation of the cost of scrap.5
Rates for Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
The statute and Commerces regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to Analysis of Comments Received individual companies not selected for examination when Commerce limits its All issues raised in the case and examination in an administrative review rebuttal briefs are addressed in the pursuant to section 777Ac2 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended the Act.
list of the issues that parties raised and Generally, Commerce looks to section to which we responded in the Issues 735c5 of the Act, which provides and Decision Memorandum is attached instructions for calculating the allto this notice as an Appendix. The others rate in an investigation, for Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file guidance when calculating the rate for electronically via Enforcement and companies which we did not examine Compliances Antidumping and in an administrative review. Section Countervailing Duty Centralized 735c5A of the Act establishes a Electronic Service System ACCESS.
preference to avoid using rates which ACCESS is available to registered users are zero, de minimis, or based entirely at https access.trade.gov. In addition, a on facts available FA in calculating an complete version of the Issues and all-others rate. Accordingly, Decision Memorandum can be accessed Commerces practice in administrative directly at http enforcement.trade.gov/ reviews has been to average the frn/index.html/.
weighted-average dumping margins for the companies selected for individual Determination of No Shipments examination in the annual review, As noted in the Preliminary Results, excluding rates that are zero, de we received a no-shipment claim from minimis, or based entirely on FA.6 For Ternium. In the Preliminary Results, we these final results of review, we preliminarily determined that Ternium calculated a weighted-average dumping had no shipments during the POR. We margin for Deacero that is above de received no comments from interested minimis and not based entirely on FA.
parties with respect to this claim.
Therefore, consistent with our practice, Therefore, we continue to find that we have assigned the companies not Ternium had no shipments during the selected for individual examination the POR.
weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Deacero.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and Final Results of the Review comments received from interested Commerce determines that the parties, we: 1 Corrected an error in following weighted-average dumping Commerces dumping margin margins exist for the period November programming when calculating the 1, 2018, through October 31, 2019:
weighted-average dumping margin for
Metals Company, Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.
and Byer Steel Corporation the petitioners.
3 See Memorandum, Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 20182019; Extension of Deadline for Final Results, dated June 22, 2021.
4 See Memorandum, Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 20182019, dated
PO 00000

Frm 00004

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice Issues and Decision Memorandum.
5 Id. at 23 and Comments 4, 5 and 6.
6 See, e.g., Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 September 11, 2008, and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 16.

E:FRFM09SEN1.SGM

09SEN1