Federal Register - September 8, 2021
Versión en texto ¿Qué es?Dateas es un sitio independiente no afiliado a entidades gubernamentales. La fuente de los documentos PDF aquí publicados es la entidad gubernamental indicada en cada uno de ellos. Las versiones en texto son transcripciones no oficiales que realizamos para facilitar el acceso y la búsqueda de información, pero pueden contener errores o no estar completas.
Fuente: Federal Register
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 171 / Wednesday, September 8, 2021 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
ADMINISTRATION
A821831
Investigation of Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions From the Russian Federation: Notice of Extension of Due Date for the Submission of Comments on the Russian Federations Status as a Market Economy Country Under the Antidumping Duty Laws Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Commerce has granted a three-day extension of the deadline to submit comments on the Russian Federations Russia status as a market economy ME country. Accordingly, the deadline to submit such comments, for all interested parties, is now no later than the close of business i.e., 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 10, 2021.
DATES: Applicable September 8, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leah Wils-Owens, Office of Policy, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202 4824203.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 30, 2021, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notice Investigation of Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions From the Russian Federation:
Opportunity to Comment on the Russian Federations Status as a Market Economy Country Under the Antidumping Duty Laws, 86 FR 41008
July 30, 2021. In that notice, Commerce announced that it is seeking public comment and information with respect to whether to continue to treat Russia as a ME country for purposes of the antidumping duty law, and it invited the public to submit comments by August 30, 2021, on such inquiry. In response to a request to extend the comment period, we extended the due date for the submission of comments to September 7, 2021.1
On September 2, 2021, we received a second request to extend the comment period. In response to this request, we have extended the due date for the submission of comments by three
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 See Investigation of Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions From the Russian Federation: Notice of Extension of Due Date for the Submission of Comments on the Russian Federations Status as a Market Economy Country Under the Antidumping Duty Laws, 86 FR 47625 August 26, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Sep 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
additional days.2 The revised due date for comments is September 10, 2021.
Interested parties may submit comments and information at the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.Regulations.gov. The identification number is ITA20210003. To be assured of consideration, written comments and information must be received no later than September 10, 2021.
Dated: September 3, 2021.
James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.
FR Doc. 202119481 Filed 9721; 8:45 am BILLING CODE 3510DSP
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration A533877
Stainless Steel Flanges From India:
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Determination of Antidumping Investigation; Notice of Amended Final Determination Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 20, 2021, the U.S.
Court of International Trade CIT
issued its final judgment in Echjay Forgings Private Limited v. United States, Consol. Court no. 1800230, sustaining the Department of Commerce Commerces remand redetermination pertaining to the antidumping duty AD
investigation of stainless steel flanges flanges from India covering the period of investigation, July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. Commerce is notifying the public that the CITs final judgment is not in harmony with Commerces final determination in that investigation, and that Commerce is amending the final determination and the resulting AD order with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Echjay Forgings Private Limited Echjay and the all other companies.
DATES: Applicable August 30, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Maciuba, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202 482- 0213.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
2 See Memorandum, Urea Ammonium Nitrate Solutions from the Russian Federation: Extension of Time to File Comments on Status, dated September 3, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50325
Background On August 16, 2018, Commerce published its Final Determination in the AD investigation of flanges from India.1
Commerce found that Echjay, along with Echjay Industries Private Limited EIPL, Echjay Forgings Industry Private Limited EFIPL, and Spire Industries Private Limited Spire, constituted a single entity. Having collapsed the companies, Commerce requested that Echjay provide information on behalf of the constituent companies of the collapsed entity. Echjay did not provide such information. Therefore, Commerce treated Echjay as noncooperative and assigned Echjay a margin based on facts available, with adverse inferences AFA. Specifically, Commerce assigned Echjay a dumping margin of 145.25
percent and a cash deposit rate of 140.39 percent, accounting for an export subsidy offset based on the parallel countervailing duty CVD
investigation.2 Commerce subsequently published the AD order on flanges from India.3
Echjay appealed Commerces Final Determination. On October 8, 2020, the CIT remanded the Final Determination to Commerce, concluding that Commerces finding of affiliation and subsequent decision to collapse Echjay with EIPL, EFIPL and Spire were unsupported by substantial evidence.4
In its remand redetermination, issued in February 2021, Commerce revisited its prior collapsing determination and concluded that it was not appropriate to treat Echjay, EIPL, EFIPL, and Spire as a single entity. As a result, Commerce also revisited its concomitant application of AFA in determining Echjays weighted-average dumping margin and calculated a revised dumping margin for the company.5
Finally, in light of Echjays revised margin, and the method used in the investigation for determining the allothers rate, we calculated a revised allothers rate of 7.00 percent. The CIT
1 See Stainless Steel Flanges from India: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstance Determination, 83 FR 40745, 40746
August 15, 2018 Final Determination.
2 Id., 83 FR 40746.
3 See Stainless Steel Flanges from India:
Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 50639 October 9, 2018.
4 See Echjay Forgings Private Limited v. United States, 475 F. Supp. 3d 1350 CIT 2020.
5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Echjay Forgings Private Limited v. United States, Consol. Court No. 1800230, Slip Op 20140 February 17, 2021.
E:FRFM08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1